My Turn
Former City Council Member Ken Bukowski
Council: Increase Citizen's Civic Engagement
The Tattler has always made itself available to all elected and former elected officials in Emeryville to use as a platform to reach out to the citizens for whatever reason they wish. We call it 'My Turn'. The electeds and former electeds are invited at any time to submit information in the public interest and the Tattler will post it verbatim.
Former Council member Bukowski takes issue with the Council’s recent turn away from a proposal to increase citizen engagement with their City Hall by re-starting remote (Zoom) meeting participation for Council meetings. Zoom participation began during the Covid pandemic and many cities continued on after by use of ‘hybrid’ participation (via zoom or in person). Emeryville’s Council said NO to this idea in 2024 but State legislation in Sacramento that would force all cities to restore hybrid meetings is being forwarded. Resisting the statewide trend towards greater municipal accountability, the Council recently told their legislative advocate in Sacramento Emeryville City Hall will “oppose unless amended”, meaning NO to citizen participation by zoom unless they’re forced to by Sacramento.
The Mayor and the Vice Mayor as it turns out have both had a change of heart about hybrid meetings, being publicly in favor of them as candidates and then moving against them once they were in power. Mayor David Mourra told the Tattler in October 2022 when he was running for election: “The ability to participate in public meetings via teleconference tools like Zoom has greatly expanded access and given voice to people who otherwise would not have been able to participate due to demands from work or family obligations. A hybrid approach seems sensible in the future.”
For her part, Vice Mayor Sukhdeep Kaur also told the Tattler in 2022: “I prefer Zoom meetings as they are much more accessible, easier to record and access later, they cut out the commute time, reduce the carbon footprint, and one can almost always make Zoom meetings even if one is in another town or country.”
Nonetheless, the Council voted to stop remote meeting participation in March 2024 after some Nazis began calling in during the public comment section.
Mr Bukowski sent the Council (and the Tattler) two letters about this issue (they have been combined below):
Dear Mayor and Council-
As a former mayor/council member who served Emeryville for 24 years, I was very discouraged when you eliminated remote participation at council meetings. There are often times at meetings when questions about past history are raised. When you eliminate remote participation, it prevents people like me from providing input which could help you decide important issues.
I'm making you aware of pending legislation SB279 which would force the restoration of remote meetings. I am not only asking for your support for this bill, I'm asking you not to wait for it to be enacted. Please take that step before it's required. Show the public you want to hear what they have to say. It could make a difference.
You may not be aware SB707 and SB292 have been recently merged. The new version will require the council meetings to have remote participation. The City may want to reconsider the City's position on the bill(s).
As I see it there is no justification for the Council to limit public participation in such a major way. There are families with kids who can't come to council meetings and a whole host of others. Remote participation exists in other cities. It is especially important in Emeryville since the local issues are not well covered. What is the point of watching a meeting and being forced to keep your opinion to yourself?
The thrust of my letter is to suggest the Council reconsider what is soon going to be required. I have watched this legislation closely, and it's well on its way to being approved.
Thank you for allowing me to share my concerns about this issue.
Best-
Ken Bukowski