Democratic Citizen Accountability Program Suspended at City Hall: No Explanation Given

Once Popular 'Coffee With the City Manger' Program Suspended 

Emeryville Citizens Used to Be Able to Speak Directly With Their City Manager Under the Program

No Longer

Emeryville’s new City Manager, La Tanya Bellow announced she would not be re-starting the former citizen engaging ‘Coffee With the City Manager’ program after having pondering over it during the first 100 days of her job as city manager.  The democratically minded program was discontinued in 2020 because of Covid but before that, the popular program enabled normal citizens to engage face to face with the most powerful government official at their City Hall.  Ms Bellow told the Tattler that while she has shuttered the Coffee Program indefinitely, she is not necessarily averse to someday re-starting it.  She did not say why she would not meet with citizens through the program.

Emeryville City Manager
La Tanya Bellow
Not a fan of transparency or 
citizen engagement. 

The government in Emeryville has long made proclamations regarding the inclusionary and democratic existential nature of City Hall and they proved it in 2014 when the popular program was initiated under former City Manager Sabrina Landreth.  Under the program, citizens could just drop by without making an appointment and speak freely with the city manager in the city manager’s office during the three hour period once a month.  

Despite ending the once a month citizen engagement, Ms Bellow, who makes $315,0000 per year, has made statements touting her approachability for regular people.  Before her hiring in January, she told the City Council she was a “committed public servant” who could be counted on to lead Emeryville’s government “with transparency, with integrity and with collaboration…with the members of this community”.  That may have been what she was thinking at the time but after settling in at her Park Avenue corner office, apparently she seems to have had a re-think.




Lack of accountability has a long tradition at Emeryville City Hall.  Before the democratically minded City Manager Landreth, Emeryville’s City Manager John Flores, for years, regularly scheduled closed-to-the-public meetings in the city manager's office with the Chamber of Commerce board president, every Monday morning at 9:00 to discuss anything that the Chamber, a private corporation, wanted to discuss.  The Chamber of Commerce, who received large amounts of money and favors from City Hall, likely discussed that and more at these regularly scheduled private meetings in the City Manager’s office.   

Former City Manager 
Sabrina Landreth
She had a democratic view
of government.  She liked to 
hear from regular citizens.

Uncomfortable with the lack of accountability and transparency, the Tattler suggested that perhaps regular people should also have a regularly scheduled time to interface one-on-one with their government.  The idea was forwarded that every month, regular citizens could freely express their ideas, suggestions or complaints directly to the city manager at their seat of government.

Although the secretive John Flores was not fond of that idea and he refused it, the democratically inclined Sabrina Landreth agreed with the Tattler and she began the program that ultimately became very popular with Emeryville citizens.  Notably, the Emeryville Police Department initiated its own "Coffee With a Cop' program patterned after the success of the city manager program, building it into their 'community policing' policy.  EPD still continues on the popular program.


The Coffee With the City Manager Program continued until Covid and the manager at the time, the former Paul Buddenhagen, did not restart it after Covid had passed, regardless of citizen requests.  Ms Bellow continues on with the refusal, despite all her highfalutin citizen engagement rhetoric.  

After she was hired, the Tattler inquired about Coffee With the City Manager and Ms Bellow indicated she would decide and make an announcement about it in the “first 100 days” of her administration. Announcing her refusal to re-start the program, she assured the Tattler she is “focused on meeting the community where they are to foster a more inclusive and responsive dialogue” after noting that her contact with the Tattler was a violation of the City Attorney’s order that no government officials may communicate with the Tattler in any way.  “I am making this one time exception” she said. 

Council Decision: Committee Selection at City Hall Will No Longer be Subject to Public Scrutiny

“Efficiency” Touted as Reason Why What Formerly Was Public Must Now Be Behind Closed Doors

“That is Not Democracy, That is a Closed Loop”

City Council member Kalimah Priforce reports how public accountability is being taken away by a recent Council majority decision to cut citizens out of longstanding City Hall committee selection process.  At the September 9th City Council meeting, the Council changed the status of Emeryville committees from 'standing' to 'ad hoc' in order to get around California law meant to keep processes publicly accessible.

 

By Kalimah Priforce

What this Council was asked to do on September 9th is not just a matter of “efficiency.”  Let’s call it what it is: a quiet consolidation of power.


We are being told that committee appointments will now be screened in small rooms, by just a couple of Council members, and then slipped onto the consent calendar for approval.  No debate.  No discussion.  No public scrutiny.


That is not democracy.  That is a closed loop.  And Emeryville knows this story - we lived through it in the John Bauters era.  The back-channeling, the rubber-stamping, the chilling of dissent.  We paid the price for it.


Now we are told this is about “streamlining.”  Well, let me tell you: corruption is always streamlined.  Inequity is always streamlined.  When you cut out public process, when you silence debate, when you bury decisions in the consent calendar - you are greasing the wheels for insider politics and shutting the public out.

The Brown Act is crystal clear.  Ad hoc committees are supposed to be temporary, narrow, and dissolved when the job is done.  If they meet every year, if they take on standing jurisdiction, they must be open to the public.  Period.  Pretending otherwise is playing with fire.

Look at Anaheim.  Look at Bell.  Both cities thought they could cut corners, centralize decisions, and keep the public in the dark.  And what did it lead to?  Scandal.  FBI raids.  Corruption.  Broken trust that took years to rebuild.


And now Emeryville is flirting with the same mistake.


Enough is enough.  If we care about equity, if we care about diversity, if we care about trust in this city, then we cannot funnel power into fewer hands.  Keep appointments at the full Council.  Let the public see who we choose and why.  That’s how you build faith in government.  That’s how you expand democracy.


 

Anything less is a Trojan horse. Anything less is a step backward.

Kalimah Priforce is an Emeryville City Council member.  He was elected to office in 2022.

Emeryville Launched Novel Legal Effort to Silence the Tattler

City's Tattler "Communication Plan" Is Really A Non-Communication Plan 

By Mr X

Emeryville’s administration is attempting to muzzle the city’s independent news service, erecting roadblocks to news-gathering and threatening the publication’s editor with prosecution. 

Oddly echoing events playing out in Washington DC, local leaders have enacted an executive order barring the Tattler’s editor from any vocal or written interaction with any city employee. 

According to a 'communication plan' drafted by City Attorney John Kennedy, Tattler editor Brian Donahue may only communicate with city elected leaders, officials or employees during the ‘public comment’ period of city council meetings. Under state regulations, city officials, elected leaders and employees are all barred from addressing concerns raised during public comment. 

Kennedy, in a memo sent to the Tattler in October, describes the Editor’s news-gathering and reporting as "harassment," “aggression,” “threatening,” “intimidating,” and “hostile,” attempting to conjure a linguistic context for his actions. Exactly the types of terms the Administration in Washington has leveled at news outlets not offering fawning, supplicating coverage. 

A bizarre attempt by Kennedy to add gravitas by citing case law, undermines his own memo, and the constitutionality of his actions potentially resulting in financial liability for the City of Emeryville. One case, Minn. Bd. Commun. for Colleges v. Knight, 465 U.S. 271 (1984) concerns unrepresented groups attending meetings for unionized employees during contract negotiations, the other, L. F. v. Lake Wash. Sch. Dist. concerned an aggrieved parent and communications with the teachers of that parent’s children and school and district officials—not an entire city. Regardless, on-going bi-weekly meetings between the parent and school officials were established. 

While this effort to restrict and eventually destroy an independent voice in Emeryville plays out in court, perhaps the most troubling aspect is how closely local officials are adhering to and advancing President Trump’s effort to silence inconvenient voices. The Emeryville Tattler must be fairly effective.

Mr X, besides working for the Tattler, was a reporter for the Oakland Tribune and several other print
publications, two NPR affiliates in Northern California and received an Edward R Murrow award for his work covering wildfires in Northern California. 

Silencing journalism increases group think, stifles public participation and decreases critical thinking.