Out With the Old
In With the New
Who Needs Stately Beaux Arts Turn-of-the-Century
Architectural Heritage
When You Can Get Modern Curved Screening
and Oceans of Stucco?
Take the 'Avalon Building' at the star intersection of Adeline Street and San Pablo Avenue. For a hundred years there was a stately Beaux Arts triangle shaped building from the turn-of-the-century "city beautiful" era there; the old First National Bank Building. But in 2000, a developer saw a payday and said he could turn a profit if he tore down that monstrosity and replaced it with a modern stucco building. It's a job the developer said that would "pencil out".
The City Council majority tells us it's best to defer to the developers. Emeryville always turns out better when we put them in the driver's seat...you know, jobs and all...revenue and whatnot. So with a subsidy from the taxpayers via the Emeryville Redevelopment Agency, the old blighted eyesore was torn down. Good riddance!
We keep tearing down these historic buildings so we know we must be doing something right in Emeryville.
Take a look at the pictures below. See how much better Emeryville is without that old Beaux Arts monstrosity? Stone quoining blocks, load bearing brick walls, deep set wood sash double hung windows with curved glass, stone columns supporting an entablature comprised of an architrave & frieze with stone mouldings, beveled glass transom window above cope and stick oak doors and copper dentils with ogee cove detailing on a three foot cantilevered cornice has been replaced with aluminum windows, stucco and curved steel screens. It's so much better now, don't you agree?
The stately old building lent a palpable sense of authentic place to San Pablo Avenue. But it was old, blighted and it had to go. The new building could be anywhere but it's new....and better!
Adeline and San Pablo Avenue The replacement: The Avalon Building 2000 Note the beautiful curved screens. Oceans of Stucco. New and so much better. |
Adeline and San Pablo Avenue The Old First National Bank Building circa 1900 Outdated blight. Old and ugly. Good riddance! |
I see what you mean. Old buildings are no good. If a developer wants to tear one down, we applaud. We say yes, yes a hundred times yes! These old buildings are a disgrace! Next to go, that atrocious 1903 City Hall building. It's more than one hundred years old...hello? That's really old! It's got to go!
ReplyDeleteThe idea isn't to tear down old buildings for the fun of it. The idea is to let free market economics (with a little government grease) be the guide. Developers know best. If a developer could turn a profit by tearing down the old City Hall building then who are we to judge?
DeleteI encourage the Emeryville City Council to tear down every building and bring in their favorite developers to "re-imagine" the city to the specifications of the highest bidders.
ReplyDeleteIt's called urban renewal and the city from border to border is in dire need of it.
Snarky, yet unfocused. What did you want me to feel after reading this?
ReplyDeleteFeel municipal pride. Pride is appropriate in this case.
DeleteAt Avalon a non-profit developer saw an opportunity to provide affordable housing to seniors and they did so. It certainly wasn't motivated by profit, because EBADC doesn't turn a profit on their development. Sure, the photo you've posted shows that the building looked great at one time, but I have no idea what it looked like in 1998. It may have only had two walls standing. Who know's? You may be right, but you certainly haven't met the burden of proof with this story. Kurt Brinkman wasn't on the Council in 2000. You try to pin this on him in your paragraph, but your readers know better. I don't know what this is, but it surely isn't journalism.
ReplyDeleteInteresting, a developer working for no money. Seems like a lot of work to not make any money. But bully on him. Kind of like a modern day Jesus I guess. Pure altruism. He must be a really great guy!
DeleteWhat did the building look like in 1998? Good point. Who knows? Maybe it was just a tar paper shack. The photo is a fake... a movie set. There's no way of knowing. There's no proof. But if the building did exist, it would have been a good one to tear down though, don't you think?
Regarding Kurt Brinkman.... It's true has wasn't on the Council in 2000 but he's been involved in lots of tear down decisions since he has been on the Council. He's one of the three that make up the majority. They're the 'tear down three'. But I'm concerned about your use of the words "pin this on him"...it's as if you think tearing down buildings isn't a wonderful idea. I don't think Mr Brinkman would appreciate you characterizing him as a radical building saving tree hugger....especially since it's not true. He's got a record of developer hugging and we have him (and the other two) to thank for all these beautiful modern stucco replacements. Kurt Brinkman is helping developers create jobs unlike his colleagues, the two nihilist radical old building savers Jac Asher and Jennifer West.
Re Journalism: I'm admittedly one sided here, taking the City Council majority at their word. Radical building savers are just that: radical building savers. I could have also asked a Stalinist or any other number of bizarre factions about this but they're outlier radicals. A journalist doesn't always have to get two sides of a story. They don't have to ask someone who denies the holocaust when doing a story on Nazi atrocities.