Invoking 'Emeryville Values', Council Excoriates Developer's Actions
Destruction of 47th Street Homes Deemed 'Detrimental' to Emeryville
In a historic and unanimous decision, the City Council moved Tuesday night to disallow a developer’s request to demolish four contiguous single family homes in the Triangle Neighborhood to be replaced with more dense market rate duplex rental homes, Emeryville's first ever ruling against a proposal to tear down existing homes in one of the City’s so called ‘zones of stability’. The remarkable event was capped by Councilman John Bauters and Mayor Christian Patz, both of whom invoked an impudent developer, calling him out for his deviousness and lack of honesty.
sailed through the Planning Commission’s October study session effortlessly, only to be stopped Tuesday by the Council who said the destruction of the existing homes would be materially detrimental to the housing needs of the City and not in the public interest. This finding singularly precludes the Council from approving the project according to the General Plan, leaving the developer, Mark Forbes CEO of F.E. Forbes Inc without a clear path forward for the 47th Street Homes. After hearing the City Council’s strong rebuke, Mr Forbes and his team left the meeting without indicating if or how they would proceed with the project.
The Council found the actions of F.E. Forbes, an out of town mortgage brokerage firm and its CEO to be not in sync with “Emeryville values”, pointing to the public testimony at the October Planning Commission study session. Long term low income tenant families of Forbes testified their corporate landlord had deferred maintenance at the homes for decades resulting in what Mr Forbes said is now a general state of disrepair, a condition he claimed as a primary reason for the demolitions. He also said the craftsman houses at 100 years, are too old and past their useful lifespan.
Several tenants testified that Forbes had recently offered $5000 to families to vacate the premises and imposed a 95% rent increase to drive out the two families that didn’t take the initial cash offer.
The Council heard tearful testimony on Tuesday from a remaining 20 year tenant and grandmother detailing how the Forbes corporation had not repaired the furnace in her home, leaving a multi generational family without heat for seven years. Councilman Bauters, an attorney, chastised CEO Mark Forbes for that transgression, characterizing his company’s failure as “landlord neglect” and “against the law”.
Mr Bauters added that he didn’t necessarily believe Mr Forbes’ claims of deterioration in the four homes, “We’re just being asked to believe the homes are in disrepair, and I have not seen any evidence of that” he said. He called Mr Forbes' presentation "insincere". Mayor Patz also expressed his disfavor in the CEO’s presentation, stating he felt the applicant had not been honest or straightforward with the Council.
Mark Forbes CEO F.E. Forbes Real Estate Investment Trust 'Not honest or straightforward; insincere' according to the City Council. |
Mr Forbes offered no response to any other allegations Tuesday night as he left the building.
Here is the meeting (start at 41:41):
I wonder what happens now.
ReplyDeleteThe Tuesday night meeting was a ‘study session’, meaning any votes or action taken had no legal constraint. This developer could take his proposal back to the Planning Commission, changed to reflect the Council’s remarks (or not changed), get approval, as he surely would with our developer friendly PC and then bring it back to the Council. Next time it would be a properly agendized item and up for a legally binding vote by the Council. It is very unlikely Mr Forbes will attempt to do that without substantively changing the project to reflect the Council’s stated objections. He could just give up entirely. The Council made it clear they felt they were being manipulated and lied to and that they are not happy with the track record of FE Forbes Inc. Does the CEO want to throw good money after bad? Hard to say…it all depends on where he lies on the developer sociopath/narcissism spectrum. I think this Council is likely not going to entertain another crack at this, not with this developer.
DeleteThanks for the follow-up reporting on this. I had no idea what he was putting the tenants through. That's not right. He shouldn't be rewarded for such bad behavior.
ReplyDeleteThanks to the council for knocking this down. We don't need this kind of development or this kind of developer in Emeryville.
ReplyDelete