Saturday, December 26, 2020

Emeryville: Where a Door is Not a Door


Door  \ dȯr \   noun

1: A hinged or otherwise movable barrier that allows ingress into and egress from an enclosure.

Emeryville Door \ ˈem-rē vil  dȯr \  noun

1: A barrier resembling a door that blocks ingress into and egress from an enclosure.


News Analysis
There’s a corporate entity in Emeryville more powerful than the City of Emeryville and the Alameda County Fire Department combined.  This is a nation-wide corporation with a local Emeryville profit center address that has the power to redefine English words in order to retroactively make signed contracts work to their benefit.  They even have the power to unilaterally re-write the fire code to make it align with their desires to increase profits (for more than 72 fiscal quarters so far).  What corporation is this?  It's CVS Pharmacy, America's ubiquitous and seemingly innocuous strip mall chain fixture.  In the world of corporate malfeasance, CVS ranks with the best of them; from illegally peddling oxycontin, to bribery of elected officials, to wholesale customer medical record HIPAA violations, CVS is a classic corporate bad actor.  
Here at their Emeryville unit, the malfeasance is more pedestrian, so to speak.  Here, it’s all about their fire exit doors.  CVS doesn’t like the doors, so they’re not allowing it, regardless of their contractual agreement with the City of Emeryville’s Planning Department or the dictates of the California Fire Code and its enforcers at the Alameda County Fire Department.  Full stop.
Permanently Locked Fire Exit Doors
On one side, a sign says "Emergency Exit"
and the other side says "Bitch".
One was put up by the Alameda County Fire Department,
the other possibly by a graffiti artist.  Or maybe
both signs were placed by the Fire Department.  



Back in 2002, when the building at 4349 San Pablo Avenue was built, the previous owner, the now defunct Longs Drugs (subsumed by CVS in 2008), agreed to place doors on the sidewalk to assuage an Emeryville General Plan dictate that requires retail businesses on that street to follow an urban design guideline meant to activate the pedestrian sidewalks.  But Longs and the new masters, CVS, prefer a suburban strip mall model for their stores with a parking lot out front and doors there.  That model ran headlong into the General Plan with its urban model.  So the pharmacy simply signed the agreement and immediately proceeded to close off the doors, rendering them inoperable.  Customers use the parking lot doors, making the Emeryville unit in the style of their preferred strip mall suburban model despite initial objections from Emeryville.  

Complaints against the CVS doors over the years have gotten nowhere because the corporate giant simply ignores pleas from the City of Emeryville and orders from the Alameda County Fire Department.  Charlie Bryant, the Planning Director of the City of Emeryville has since given up asking CVS to honor their agreement and he now fully takes the position that the doors need not be operational for the corporation to be in compliance.  Mr Bryant has not seen fit to answer to the definition of the common English word “door” that is explicit in its insistence that a person be able to pass through one for it to qualify.  Resemblance to a door is good enough.
  
Over at the Alameda County Fire Department, they’re not so blatant in siding with CVS, rather they simply aren’t enforcing the ongoing fire code violation.  Citizen complaint driven rather than fire concern driven,  ACFD keeps issuing orders to keep the doors open but CVS keeps ignoring the orders.  Interestingly, a while back, the ACFD put up an “Emergency Exit” sign on the outside to keep homeless people from blocking the doors.  But inside, the exit is still blocked by CVS with merchandise and a permanently closed heavy steel roll down door.

These are just a couple of doors.  Why is our government so flummoxed by this?  Why can’t this easy problem just be taken care of?  Is our government really this hapless?  These doors, meant to enliven the San Pablo Avenue sidewalk and to keep people safe in the event of a fire, can be seen as a metaphor for the general state of societal dysfunction over the last couple of decades where governance over the public commons has increasingly played deference to private corporations that are untouchable in their monarchal power.  This corporation doesn’t want these doors so they’re not going to open them.  Eighteen years in, that’s obviously the end of the discussion.  Still, we like to imagine a bygone time when the Alameda County Fire Department worked to keep the public safe from fire and when the City of Emeryville, likewise burdened with the people’s business, were unconcerned with a private corporation’s pecuniary interests regardless how many billions in assets it might have.

The latest order from the Alameda County Fire Department.
Every so often the Emeryville CVS Pharmacy gets one of these orders. 
The corporation promptly puts them in 'File 13' and goes about its business.
Maybe the Fire Department thinks the scary red ink is helping.

8 comments:

  1. I'm not surprised they blew off Emeryville city hall but the Alameda County fire department? That's surprising. The FD could shut it down for ignoring the order. CVS is tempting fate by this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Alameda County Fire Department took over the Emeryville Fire Department in 2012. If the ACFD didn't shut down CVS from 2012 to now for this ongoing fire escape violation, it's unlikely they'll ever do it. They appear to be a paper tiger when it comes to challenging nation-wide corporate power. They'll most likely stick to enforcing orders where they can have some effect; against mom and pop operations.

      Delete
    2. If that door would have remained open it would have been a shoplifters dream. I shopped at this store almost daily and was appalled almost daily with the extreme and blatant shoplifting. The employees were helpless and fearful. CVS now closed that location along with other a host of other Bay Area locations. And other closures across the country. They are still opening stores in areas with more controlled crime. It’s sad that they were forced to close a much needed establishment due to the overwhelming crime. Let’s face it…
      If it was profitable it would be open still. I wish we would focus on the root cause of the problems that our retailers have instead of blasting them for “doors” so it can be easier for you. Or to “look better”. Crazy days. I work close to that location. Its not retail but we’re still discussing moving to another city… same reason… too much crime. To many problems. To much ignoring the problem.

      Delete
    3. This response is not cogent. Did you read the story? CVS Pharmacy was in business on San Pablo Avenue for 20 years. During that whole time, by keeping that door inoperable, they never met their obligations to the Planning Department at the City of Emeryville and they put the community in danger by violating the Alameda County Fire safety regulations. But you state there was "to[o] many problems. To[o] much ignoring the problem." I agree with you the City and the ACFD did too much ignore the problem. But you are not happy for some reason about the door. The CVS won that battle of keeping the door locked. Did you read that? So regarding shoplifting, the part you're not happy about that makes more sense, what should the City have done? Should the taxpayers have been forced to give monthly checks to CVS to compensate for their losses? What are you suggesting?

      Delete
  2. Isn’t it obvious? Your reply actually highlights the problem. If all the energy that all the different stake holders have could just be focused into the REAL root cause of the problems ( out of control crime. Criminals that have zero fear of arrest) then decisions to “close doors” would never happen in the first place. I’m 100000% sure that any retailer would LOVE to have as many entrances into their stores as possible. And no I 100% don’t care about “promises” when the promise would simply invite more crime. I also seem to remember that there was an “emergency exit” on the other wall anyways.
    The only logical reason any “entrance” would remain closed would be an attempt to control the crime and attempt to stay in business. It’s sad that they had to fight these battles and STILL can’t be profitable enough to stay open. Our crime is the root cause of MANY battles…
    Many decisions … none of which should be necessary. Makes me very sad that the community my family moved to 40 years ago can’t even support much needed service providers. It’s not just Emeryville. CVS and Walgreens are closing up and running for the hills all over the Bay Area. Opening stores where they feel they can be profitable and “open doors”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "All that energy"? What are you talking about? The police are tasked with fighting crime, not City Hall and not the fire department. And why are you angry about this? Your side won. CVS never opened their door onto the street as they agreed to do and neither City Hall or the fire department made them do it. That's a victory for CVS and you.
      This whole thing set a terrible precedent for businesses that don't want to make their fire escape doors accessible in the future in Emeryville, "CVS was never made to, so why should we?" Somebody will eventually die with this kind of neglectful governance culture taking hold.

      Delete
  3. People already die … daily… due to the crime. Why mad? Because of the crime AND the inability for everyone to work on it as a whole. As a group. Everyone has fire exits. Including that building. I walked past it the other day. There are two. Opening the door to the street would invite MORE and massive unnecessary crime putting everyone at either risk. The police need everyone’s help to make good decisions. I got curious lately and when was in an Oakland CVS yesterday I asked about Emeryville. The employee there also worked in Emeryville prior. He said that store was scary. And that it averaged about $300,000-$400,000 a year just in shoplifting. Crazy! And BTW … “sides” … is also the problem. Probably the biggest. Everyone with the same exact goals would get stuff done. Everyone fighting about everyone gets nothing done. As it has always been. And I guess always will be. It would be a lot easier to find agreeable solutions to the smaller issues in our city if we weren’t dealing with the biggest problem … crime. I’m mad because instead of attacking CVS or anyone for that matter on an article .. I wish I would have read 50 articles attacking the root problem. I’m mad because CVS said screw it and left. And instead of helping them find solutions we attack a door. If that door ever was opened more people would have been hurt. Or even killed. $300k would have been $800k. And they would have left town that much faster.
    I won’t reply anymore. Done with this forum. So don’t bother replying. I’m sure you will as you seem like a “last word” type of guy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You’ve created a really interesting take on what was considered conventional wisdom: emergency fire escape doors cause death from criminals.

      The 146 people that perished in the 1911 New York Shirtwaist factory fire at the hands of criminals as they fled the fire through the emergency exit could have been spared if they had stayed inside and fought the fire themselves. As it was, they went out through the fire door, not thinking, and into the criminal zone where they were all picked off as they exited. Just think how many people could be saved around America if we sealed off every emergency exit in every business! How stupid we have all been! Thanks for educating us former Tattler reader. And you might want to consider going over to Rob’s blog to get your news….comments like yours will be very much appreciated over there. Off you go then.

      Delete