Sunday, February 12, 2023

Kalimah Priforce Wins Democratic Party Delegate Race for Emeryville

 Mayor's Losing Fight Against Councilman Priforce 

Priforce Victory Called 'Huge Upset'


Money & Power Backed Council Member Courtney Welch Loses


Council member Kalimah Priforce
Big winner in Friday's delegate race and rising 
regional political star representing Emeryville.
Emeryville City Councilman Kalimah Priforce was part of a slate of 12 progressive candidates, all of whom won a landslide victory in a contentious Democratic delegate race to the California 18th Assembly District, announced by the party Friday. Council member Priforce handily defeated Councilwoman Courtney Welch who ran as part of a corporate backed slate of candidates, but that slate of 14 candidates were all defeated excepting for one.  The rank and file Democratic Party delegate election represents a defeat for the corporate backed 18th Assembly District representative, Mia Bonta, who leveraged her power to try to get her slate of candidates elected.  The election results, what many are calling a ‘huge upset’, were unexpected owing to the power and money representing Ms Bonta’s slate.  The newly elected delegates will serve under a now weakened Assemblywoman Bonta.

Mayor John Bauters
He endorsed the loser,
Councilwoman Courtney Welch.
The election of Mr Priforce as Democratic delegate means Emeryville’s interests will serve an oversized role in the delegation with our little town representing one of the 14 in a district that encompasses all of Alameda and most of Oakland.  Had Ms Welch also been elected, Emeryville’s power in the California Democratic Party would have been hugely increased.  However, Emeryville’s Mayor John Bauters used his position to lead a drive to steer votes away from Council member Priforce being elected in favor of Ms Welch.  As such, the regional election for the 18th District, conducted over the last couple of months, has come to be seen by East Bay politicos as part of a proxy battle for who is to control Emeryville City Hall, Mr Bauters or Mr Priforce.

The loss for Ms Welch is a blow for Mayor Bauters who has used his position to push against Council member Priforce in the Council chambers and in the delegate race securing the endorsement of Ms Welch by Council colleagues Ally Medina, and David Mourra.  Despite his Council colleagues working against him and with the delegate race won, Mr Priforce is now seen as a rising political star in regional politics, and a challenge to Mr Bauters. The two councilmen can be seen as representing two different visions for Emeryville with Mr Bauters’ side represented by a deference to housing developers versus a deference to a more democratic policy vision shown by Mr Priforce.  

Assemblywoman Mia Bonta
Her slate of corporate backed
candidates, including Courtney Welch
 lost.
The ‘battle for the 18th ‘ delegate race was represented by the two opposing slates, Mr Priforce’s grassroots progressive “People’s Slate” and the Mia Bonta corporate backed and ironically named “Progressive Unity and Labor Slate” that Ms Welch ran with.  The People’s Slate for the 18th District was endorsed by Our Revolution, a national grassroots political organization started by Senator Bernie Sanders and a critic of Councilwoman Courtney Welch, whom they called a “corporate backed Democrat”.

During the campaign, Councilman Priforce signed a pledge to not take donations from corporations including from corporate real estate organizations such as YIMBY, an action that the YIMBY backed Councilwoman Courtney Welch mocked on the campaign trail.

Speaking to the Tattler, Allyssa Victory, the top vote getter in the Democratic delegate race and an Oakland mayor challenger in the election last November said,  “The People’s Slate was truly independent and all 12 candidates were successfully elected due to a strong grassroots campaign that included a people-centered platform, direct outreach, voter registration, and education to overcome the many hurdles in the election process. All members of the Slate, whether re-elected or elected for the first time, ran to change the status quo by addressing the crises in our democracy and increasing accountability to the people we are elected to represent."

Council member Priforce came in 6th place in the delegate race with 286 votes while Council member Welch came in 16th place with 192 votes.

Councilwoman Courtney Welch
She has the support of corporations but she
does not have the support the of the people.

The People's Slate
Swept the Corporate Backed Slate
Non corporate and victorious.  All signed pledges not to take corporate money.
Every candidate won their race.


26 comments:

  1. You idiot. Priforce did not beat Welch. If you actually paid attention instead of posting garbage you would see that the election was for 7 self identifying females and 7 other than self-identifying females to be elected. They weren’t even competing for the same slots.

    What a hilarious spin job. The people’s slate ran went low and ran an ugly attack campaign and you were party to it as their mouth piece. You also missed folks from the other slate also including these YIMBYs folks you keep bashing.

    Good god this blog is so dumb.

    I’m so glad this dumb election is finally over. Folks like you try to make being delegate into this huge thing which it’s not and really suly the whole thing. In no other part of the state does this race evoke so much stupid drama. I’m a past delegate all it is is a free pass to a fucking state conference where people just rubber stamp the state platform and planks and then go partying together. Holy fucking Christ, Batman ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I must say I do love Tattler Haters. Why? Because they’re so much fun! Fun to take down.
      This Tattler hater (DM?) knows that Kalimah won and Courtney lost and she is just lying in her comment but to the rest of you, it’s important to know that this spring when the Democratic delegates assemble and begin their work voting on the party platform and selecting party leadership positions, Kalimah Priforce will be there doing his duty and voting along with the rest of the winners announced on Friday. Who won’t be there? Courtney Welch. Why? Because she LOST.

      The Democratic Party at the 18th Assembly District likes to ensure gender equality by guaranteeing there be seven winning SIF delegates (Self Identifying Females) and seven winning OSIFs (Other than Self Identifying Females). Kalimah Priforce came in third place among OSIFs which means he won and will become a delegate. Courtney Welch came in ninth place among SIFs which means she lost and will not become a delegate.

      The only way around this loss for Courtney Welch is if she can convince Assemblywoman Mia Bonta to place her in her own personal group of delegates that doesn’t get decided by the people. If that happens, the Tattler will report. But to repeat, Kalimah Priforce is the people’s democratic choice and he won the election. The people said NO to Courtney Welch and she lost. I know this is hard for you to accept but Democratic politics in California is not like Republican politics in Washington DC. Here the losers lose.

      Oh and you may think the Tattler is dumb but at least we know that three is smaller than seven and nine is bigger than seven. No party for you (or Courtney).

      Delete
  2. The business and government elite (and their sycophants) don’t like to be held to account, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  3. He always says that he loves to “take down” haters. Careful Tattler reader, or he might start calling you names, or say you’re uneducated, or throw the Brown act at you. Good thing we’re protected by the constitution and are allowed to call his blog dumb.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course you can call the Tattler dumb. You can call it worse than that if you like. The Tattler posts all comments, unlike the other Emeryville news blog. The Tattler will 'throw the Brown Act at' all who celebrate its violation. Those would usually be the business and government elite BTW.

      Delete
  4. He also brings up the other Emeryville blog all the time, even if it hasn't been mentioned by anybody else. It's this childish thought he has that if we don't like his blog, we must be in cahoots with the other blog. Some deep insecurities here at the Tattler. He also tries really hard to sound smart and witty using words like "scheffer" and "sycophant" (he uses that one ALL THE TIME). It's almost like he wants desperately for people to think he's smarter than your average blogger.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. News seekers in Emeryville have only two sources (even though Rob’s blog is mostly now restaurant advertising, real estate advertising and the police blotter). If you don’t like the Tattler, you’re left with restaurant advertising and ‘if it bleeds, it leads’. Some people like that kind of thing more than mostly political news the Tattler reports. I direct people over to Rob’s site if I think they would be happier there (and because I don’t make money off page views).

      I don’t try to ‘sound smart’ with the Tattler. I just tailor my reporting to people with high school diplomas or greater. Emeryville has the highest educational status of any East Bay city (more than Berkeley!) and so my writing style fits the demographic. Because of this I use words most people know by the time they graduate the 12th grade…words like sycophant. I could say ‘a person who acts obsequiously toward someone important in order to gain advantage’ every time I need to talk about that but notice how many more words I have to use? It’s very cumbersome. So I use the most accurate word. I’m sorry if this is too academic for you. Maybe you should head over to Rob’s blog where the prose is more….how should I say it? Dumbed down.

      Delete
    2. I think we all know that there’s only one “blog” in Emeryville and it’s the one hosted on blogspot.com. Brian’s jealousy of the other news site and the loyal following and revenue its built is obvious in almost every story he writes. Rob is truly living “rent free” in Brian’s head.

      Delete
    3. You say this blog is only for high school diplomas or greater. Yet most uneducated people are the ones that are being most affected by corporate greed. Why do you shun uneducated people all the time, but try really hard to appear like a crusader for the little guy? This is another reason you lost.

      Delete
    4. Getting technical about it, being that a ‘blog’ is defined as: ‘a Web site on which someone writes about personal opinions, activities, and experiences’, neither site is actually a blog, because both sites commonly contain news stories but not personal activities or experiences (Rob’s recent story about his train trip to Seattle notwithstanding). Both sites have a guest article feature but only the Tattler has a regular contributor besides the editor, making the Tattler the less ‘bloggy’ of the two (not that there’s anything wrong with bloginess).

      Other than that, Rob’s blog and the Tattler are completely different. Rob uses the business model and the Tattler doesn’t. Rob’s blog is underwritten by corporations, whom he commonly writes flattering stories about while the Tattler never takes money from anyone. Rob wants and needs clicks to justify his advertising rate but the Tattler doesn’t need clicks at all. Rob is primarily concerned with forwarding the interests of the business community and the Tattler is interested in furthering the interests of the resident community. The Tattler doesn’t advertise on social media or anywhere else for that matter because there’s no benefit to be had. People come to the Tattler of their own free will, driven by their own interests. Rob needs to coerce people to feed the business model. The Tattler has loyal readers who know we will never ask them for money nor will we ever ask them to withstand a barrage of commercial vending.

      The Tattler reports on Rob because he is a newsmaker in the public interest. So for instance, we reported on Rob defrauding Emeryville’s Below Market Rate housing program, of which he was a beneficiary. Later, we reported when he moved to Contra Costa County after the City of Emeryville forced him out of his government subsidized housing unit.

      I thank you for your comment.

      Delete
    5. Wait, are you saying that the city charged Rob with fraud or are you Brian Donahue, known fabricator of the truth accusing him of such?
      I hear you live at the artist coop which is intended to provide stable housing for artists yet everyone hates you and you haven’t produced a single piece of art (unless you consider the fiction you write “art”?) in decades while owning property outside the state and paying like $100 in annual CA property taxes because of Prop 13. The hypocrisy of this guy!

      Delete
    6. This reader isn't complaining about it. It is our constitutional right to leave comments in the Emeryville Tattler. And like one of the readers commented, we should be thankful that Brian created this forum so we could discuss his "articles". Brian doesn't get to decide when the conversation is over. Also, could I buy one of your sculptures? I'm a critical thinker, I think I qualify to have an original Brian Donahue in my home.

      Delete
  5. You do delete comments though, like that one time you got dragged into a mud fight by that teenage troll. I understand it wasn't a good look for you, hence why you deleted that whole conversation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Tattler is meant for adults. Children can read it of course but if they comment and reveal they are children, I will not post those (unless I post a story expressly meant for children but even then, they would have to comment anonymously).

      Delete
    2. That's a shame.

      Delete
  6. Who voted in this election? I have been a registered Democrat in Alameda County for more than 50 years and didn't receive a ballot or a notice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’m not a Democrat so I’m not sure how they noticed people. You should ask people at the county level.

      Delete
  7. It's true that Emeryville has the highest educational status of any East Bay city (more than Berkeley!), which is why they only gave you 900 votes in the recent election. Like you said in a previous comment, "here the losers lose".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Smart people or educated people aren’t clairvoyant. They need to know about things to process them and arrive at a decision. If a candidate for political office doesn’t get enough funding to get his message out to the people, many people won’t know about his ideas. That’s why campaign financing laws are forwarded (by those who don’t tout the corporate/plutocrat line), to enable all ideas equal visibility. If you don’t spend money, lots of money, you don’t get your message out and you lose. People without corporate funding are losers.

      Delete
    2. Maybe. But do you think that it could also be that the smart people of Emeryville just Googled "Brian Donahue", went through the first page, and then made up their minds?

      Delete
    3. No, because if the smart people of Emeryville knew about what was in my campaign literature they would then do what smart people do: check the veracity of the claims, in this case by going to the California Department of Education. And then they would see they were being presented with two visions of public education in Emeryville. They would have seen the vision of the status quo of the three incumbents and their expensive failing schools versus my vision trying a new way by empowering teachers and stopping spending on educational consultants and then they would have voted for me (presuming they are not child hating sociopaths). But this didn’t happen because I couldn’t get my message out to enough (smart) people.

      Delete
    4. Did your brother win his council seat because he took corporate money, or did people just like him?

      Delete
    5. He took corporate money and (some) people also liked him. Like Donald Trump and George W Bush. All are examples of candidates for political office (who took corporate money and) whom enough people liked.

      Delete
    6. Is not the freedom to debate, to criticize, and to protest, a testament of the relevance and power of our government? Brian Donahue should be commended in his capacity to create a forum for public opinion and we all should be thankful that such a vehicle for opinion exists!

      Delete
    7. No, I’m not saying what the people of Emeryville would have done had you had the backing for them to read your literature. I’m saying, what did the people of Emeryville actually do leading up to them casting their vote for Emeryville school board. Did they say to themselves, “I don’t know who this Brian Donahue is, so I’m not going to vote for him.” Or did they say, “I don’t know who Brian Donahue is, let me look him up…oh he almost got arrested crashing a party he had no business being in? I’m not voting for that.” You could believe whatever you want, but let me say you spend 40+ years in Emeryville with a highly visible platform to express your opinions, and all you could muster is 900 votes? Well, like a famous Emeryville resident once said, “here the losers lose”.

      Delete
  8. Did you just say that this blog is intended for only high school graduates? You talk so much about the "elite" and then you say something like that?

    ReplyDelete