The End of the 'Bauters Era'
Housing Development Corporations Benefited Tremendously Under Bauters But
Residents Saw Little Benefit, Mostly Rising Problems
John Bauters stepped down from the Emeryville City Council December 10th as a necessary result of him choosing to run a campaign for Alameda County Supervisor. That race ended in a November 5th loss and finished an eight year political career for the undisputed leader of Emeryville.
Stripped of power and now just a private citizen, it's a good time to reflect on John Bauters’ tenure as our leader; the man who for better or worse, ran the ‘Bauters Era’ for our town.
First running a losing campaign for the City Council as a conservative in 2014, Bauters tried again as a progressive in 2016 and won after having received the endorsement of the popular center left residential activist group Residents United for a Livable Emeryville (RULE). After taking office, he quickly repositioned himself as a conservative in the mold of his mentor, the former leader of Emeryville, Nora Davis. Both Ms Davis and Mr Bauters unabashedly led Emeryville by embracing a top down, pro-corporate, private sector deregulation governing philosophy. For Council member Davis it was a pro-development-of-any-kind philosophy and for Council member Bauters it was a pro-housing developer philosophy. Both leaders took a hands off approach to corporate developers seeking profit maximization in our town. As a result, with Ms Davis in control, Emeryville delivered three major suburban style auto-centric shopping malls and the giant campus closed to the public Pixar while Mr Bauters delivered the ubiquitous seen-one-you've-seen-them-all rental apartment blocks. Notably, John differed from Councilwoman Davis insofar as he likes to ride his bike.
Flowing from this pro-developer epistemological polity, many of the things people in Emeryville like have been delegated to second tier status; things like creating new parks, creating housing for families, locally serving storefront retail and creating a city of homeowners versus renters. Because housing developers would have to pay for them, these are things developers don’t want and as a result, these are things not delivered on Mr Bauters’ watch. For the record, Bauters himself says he’s a YIMBY Council member. The San Fransisco Chronicle agreed, as revealed in their story where they called our Councilman “The most YIMBY mayor in the most YIMBY city in California”.
There were some positive things Council member Bauters brought. He is a very effective speaker and able to effectively galvanize people when he needs to. Early in his first term, Bauters staged community building citizen appreciation events at the Council meetings where individual citizens would be called up to the podium and awarded plaques of appreciation from the City of Emeryville for their public good works. He pushed through a taxpayer funded $50 million affordable housing bond to try to ameliorate the gentrifying effects of all the market rate luxury apartments developers like to build. But conspicuously, it has just been all-rental apartments, all the time.
A good way to recount the adverse effects of the Bauters Era on those living here is to simply tally the most egregious negativity he delivered:
1) He rolled back the wages of the poorest working poor among us when he rolled back our minimum wage.
2) He said NO to any new parks until there is enough rental housing built (but he has refused to tell us how much housing we need).
3) Going against our General Plan, he transformed Emeryville from a city of homeowners into a city of renters.
4) Siding with the corporate Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) developer lobbying group YIMBY, he has moved against local control of our housing policy in order to hand it over to corporations.
5) After turning us into a city of renters, he has stopped all attempts to empower renters seeking rent stabilization or rent control (because developers are against it).
6) After agreeing to allow a code of ethics law for Emeryville, he has said NO to allowing an independent ethics commission to ensure the new law is not politicized and applied fairly and equitably.
7) As chair of the Budget and Governance Committee for eight consecutive years, he failed due diligence and brought the worst budget deficit in Emeryville history.
8) In order to facilitate a proposed all-rental housing project, the ill fated 700’ tall ‘Onni Tower’, he proposed a roll back two of Emeryville’s new ordinances meant to ameliorate the ill effects of developer greed: the tower separation ordinance and the unit mix ordinance.
9) After pushing through a Council resolution to support Ukraine from Russian aggression, he said NO to a call for a Gaza ceasefire resolution.
10) He intervened and stopped our democratic mayoral rotation in order to take a second term for himself, stating he is needed because of his budget expertise (and then he blow up the deficit).
Homelessness in Emeryville as candidate John Bauters reported it to the voters. He did a great job he said. But something critical is missing from this narrative. |
Perhaps the most disturbing development at the Council in the Bauters Era is the new zero accountability, zero transparency culture. Like Council members Courtney Welch and Sukhdeep Kaur after him, Bauters refused to answer questions from his constituents (if the questions are tough). He refused to answer emails, texts or calls. Adding to this, he refused to hold press conferences, and as a result, the people never got any accountability from him. Mr Bauters, seeking bigger political office after Emeryville, protected his brand and his narrative at all costs, eschewing any negativity that could rub off on him were he to have engaged with his constituents or the press. So far Courtney Welch is following this same path. Notably, Nora Davis did not see her role as a public servant like Bauters and Welch do: Council member Davis took questions and comments from all comers; a tradition of public accountability that sadly has died with Bauters.
Emeryville has the unfortunate distinction that it regularly falls victim to a ‘strongman’ culture at City Hall. After the fall of the criminally corrupt John LaCoste era of the 70’s, Emeryville has had three multi-year leaders. Two of the three have been pro-corporate, pro-developer conservatives. The three have been Nora Davis, conservative, 25 years in power (four in the wilderness), Jac Asher, progressive, 5 years in power followed by Bauters, conservative, eight years in power. Council member Bauters has groomed the conservative, pro-developer Courtney Welch to be our new leader but it is not clear during this interregnum period if that will become our continuing illiberal future.
Over the last 38 years, other than the few short years with a progressive in power, conservative politics here have resulted in a corporate retail chain store and traffic clogged city with the fewest acres of parks per resident of any town in the Bay Area. Emeryville is the largest town without a library in the Bay Area, it has the lowest percentage of families of any town in the East Bay, and the highest rate of renters over homeowners in the East Bay. Emeryville’s renter residents live alone and cut off from a community due to the auto centric nature of our town. At 1.8 people per housing unit, Emeryville has the lowest number of people per housing unit in the East Bay. In a town like this, without an engaged citizenry, it’s not surprising Emeryville has the second worse school district in the East Bay. This is the legacy of the Bauters Era.
Former Emeryville City Council member John Bauters 2016-2024 Back in 2026? |