Sunday, May 25, 2025

Emeryville: the Worst City in Northern Alameda County For Climate Change Policy


Climate Change Policy: Emeryville Stuck in 11th Place in Alameda County 

All the Talk From City Hall About Meeting the Climate Challenge Appears to be Nothing But Talk

The Bay Area’s Climate Emergency Mobilization Task Force released their 2024-’25 Alameda County Scorecard report this week, revealing Emeryville to be once again in last place among cities in the progressive northern section of the county on critical climate infrastructure and policy.  The task force, a Bay Area wide coalition of elected officials, city and county staff, community based non-governmental organizations, youth, environmental and social activists and “front line communities”, released the scorecard Thursday.

Emeryville: Talk, Talk, Talk

Emeryville City Hall has engaged in a lot of conspicuous and heated rhetoric about meeting its climate change challenge over the years.  That appears to have been nothing as much as facile civic boosterism, especially in light of the second CEMTF study.  The independent CEMTF study shows something different, countering Emeryville's sunny prognosis.  The climate scorecard shows Emeryville, with an overall score of 48: 11th place among 15 Alameda County cities the task force studied, the same ranking as the last time the task force did their evaluation. 

UPDATE:  It should be noted that the Task Force missed an Emeryville ordinance that prohibits new gas stations and that fact should increase the City's score (see note below).

Besides the unique case of Emeryville, the worst scoring cities came from the politically conservative, heavily Republican southern portion of Alameda County with the exceptions of Hayward and Livermore who both scored 70, placing them tied for third place.

Although the task force assigned Emeryville a score of 48 on the checklist this time, far lower than every other neighboring city,  an improvement was shown over the 44 Emeryville received in the 2023-24 scorecard.  The problem for Emeryville is that most other cities in the county also improved their scores, leaving the little city with the same ranking as last time.  Only four other cities scored worse than Emeryville, including Dublin who dropped to last place with a dismal score of 28 after sharing with Emeryville 11th place last time.

Emeryville is stuck in 11th place, two studies
running.

The cities of Berkeley and Oakland both shared the top place with scores of 78 each.  
 

The climate task force teamed up with undergraduate students at the University of California Berkeley to produce the document entitled ‘Alameda County Climate Scorecard 2024-2025’.  Motivating the partnership is the desire to inspire local communities to move the needle to meet the challenges facing humanity brought by the climate change crisis.  

The CEMTF sums up the challenge: From air pollution equity to transportation, our scorecard measures the climate progress of cities in their quest to meet climate challenges and rise to climate opportunities especially because no climate issue in the Bay Area or globally is just about climate - our scorecard aims to honor the intersectionality of climate change and its impacts on our community, especially in the Bay with its simultaneous rich diversity and astronomical inequality.


EDITOR'S NOTE: The Alameda County Climate Scorecard missed that the Emeryville City Council effectively prohibited the development of new gas stations within city limits with passage of a Council approved ordinance in June 2024.   Construction of new structures for traditional "auto-centric" uses, including gas stations, car washes, and auto dealerships is restricted.  Thanks to the Tattler reader that brought this to our attention and to Council member Priforce for providing the details.  The Task Force has been notified of this change.  This will improve Emeryville's score a little, but we're not sure by how much.




13 comments:

  1. All this "study" shows is how butt hurt these left wing college students are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It also shows how the government will tend to make up stuff to bolster their image. There's nothing like independent journalism to keep the government honest.

      Delete
  2. Thanks Tattler. This is not something we would hear from the city.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This scorecard is a mishmash of a few good things, a few things that are unrelated to climate, while the rest is junk science and empty platitudes. The optimal “score” is not 100 — more like 15

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The city of Dublin would probably agree with you.

      Delete
  4. The item "declared racism a public health issue" -- seems like a weighty issue, but not related to the climate. Meanwhile, several other items on this list will definitely hurt the poor. Bike infrastructure and EV stations are for the richest

    ReplyDelete
  5. Brian, can you Google “has Emeryville banned new gas stations” and report back what the result is? You might not consider factchecking the sources you pull data from and post on your blog your job but it draws in to question the accuracy of this scorecard and the advocacy groups with an agenda (not climate scientists) that are fronting it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am investigating this and will report out what I find. Thank you for the comment.

      Delete
    2. Thank you, Tattler reader. I have changed the story to reflect the salient point in your comment.

      Delete
    3. OK, now google “Does Emeryville prohibit building new buildings with natural gas?”
      Perhaps you’ll be directed to a real news source that actually does some research before publication because yours and this fake “scorecard” organization apparently do not.

      Delete
    4. The answer is: NO, Emeryville currently does not prohibit natural gas in new buildings. A previous ordinance requiring all-electric construction in new residential buildings was repealed in April 2024.
      To the question of “Does Emeryville prohibit new buildings with natural gas?” the CEMTF said it was “in process” of that. What false information are you seeing?

      Delete
    5. If you did any reading on the subject you’d see that this was overturned by the federal govt. two years ago therefore no cities have implemented this policy. What is the point of scoring a city based on implementing something deemed illegal? The point being that this scorecard is a joke and you regurgitating it without thought makes you a joke.

      Delete
    6. To call this settled law is a joke. The legality of stopping new building construction from using natural gas is currently being debated and challenged in courts. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit indeed overturned Berkeley's gas ban, ruling that it was preempted by the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). But a different federal judge more recently struck down the Berkeley ban, upholding a New York City ban on natural gas in new buildings. This ruling provides a strong legal basis for similar policies, according to legal experts and it presents a conflicting view with the Berkeley case. In summary, while some cities and states are actively trying to ban natural gas in new construction to combat climate change, the legality of such bans is currently in flux due to ongoing legal challenges and conflicting court rulings. The Trump administration is against gas bans but it is not clear he will ultimately prevail.

      It is true that I posted this Climate Emergency Mobilization Task Force scorecard produced by graduate students at Cal Berkeley even though there are conflicting rulings from federal judges on the gas ban with the knowledge this may not be completely settled for years. However, that could be the case for many such findings by this group and many other groups who study and report on public policy and it’s not the Tattler’s job to wait until God comes down from the clouds to rule with finality on each controversial topic that may be legally challenged in our divided country. News is happening in Emeryville and the Tattler is reporting it, even if you think it’s premature. You are free to think not waiting until Trump has finally and completely had his way with us is a joke but many people will disagree with you.

      Delete