Emeryville Assessed Valuation Plummets
The sour economy continues to hit Emeryville hard, now driving the assessed property valuation down more than 6% from last year, the largest drop in Alameda County. The dire numbers threaten last year's Measure J school bond financing which requires a 4% positive growth to keep the taxpayers payback interest rate out of the stratosphere. See the October 17th 2010 Tattler story Here.
Emeryville's bad assessed valuation continues to draw in its largest corporate landowners such as Pixar and Wareham Development, demanding their taxes be lowered. See the Tattler Feburary 27th 2011 story Here
Karan Reid, Emeryville's chief financial officer puts a positive spin on the news and obeys the first rule of government propaganda; exclaim how the bad number is actually better than you expected.
Re-printed from the Oakland Tribune:
Alameda County assessed property values dip as a whole
Posted: 07/25/2011 06:50:08 PM PDT
Updated: 07/25/2011 08:41:52 PM PDT
Assessed values of residential and commercial properties in Alameda County continue to fall, according to newly released figures from the county assessor's office.
Although many of the 492,000 taxable residential and commercial properties evaluated by the assessor's office saw their values rise or at least stay the same, 22 percent had reduced assessments, bringing the county's total taxable dollar value to $192.0 billion from $192.1 billion.
The assessed value of a property determines how much property tax the county will receive to fund safety net services for residents. The dip marks only the third year in at least five decades that the county assessment roll has fallen. The average annual growth in past years was 8 percent.
Not even the growth in Berkeley, Piedmont and Dublin -- the highest in the county -- tipped the scales enough to close the gap.
The slight decrease countywide was not enough to hurt the county's budget, though the outcome was still disappointing. The county was expecting a 1 percent increase. And 90 percent of the county's limited discretionary revenue depends on property tax dollars.
Revenue might have been higher overall in a better market, Alameda County Chief Deputy Assessor Brian Hitomi said. But banks are still being tight with credit and new construction is on hold.
The numbers, Hitomi said, are an indicator of "how thing are going" in the overall economy.
Judging by the conservative budgeting by cities, the overall economy still is precarious.
"We didn't want to anticipate growth and get burned by it," said David McPherson, revenue and tax administrator for the city of Oakland, which saw a 1.67 percent rise.
Emeryville, in contrast, came in 6.62 percent below last year, a decrease of about $277.6 million. The drop seemed like a reversal of fortunes for the city studded with big-box stores such as Home Depot, Ikea and Barnes & Noble. Emeryville had escaped declines in previous years while some of its neighbors scrambled to compensate.
The city's chief financial officer, Karan Reid, attributed this year's decline to several one-time but significant events for which Emeryville had braced itself. The dramatic write-down of the Watergate Towers office complex topped the list.
The city also suffered after the county cleared a backlog of applications from businesses requesting their property assessments be lowered.
Emeryville will be able to contain the impact of the decline. In fact, Reid said she had expected a much larger drop. Unlike many cities, property tax makes up a small portion of general fund revenue in Emeryville. Capital projects, business subsidies and low-income subsidies will feel a pinch because they are funded through property taxes.
Fremont also had braced itself for the inevitable blow from last year's closure of the NUMMI auto plant and sale of the land to Tesla Motors and Union Pacific. The city was told to expect a 40 percent plunge in the parcel's value.
The news that Pleasanton values declined by $204.7 million did not come as a shock to finance director Emily Wagner. She had budgeted for the foreclosure of the five-building Stoneridge Corporate Plaza next to Stoneridge Mall, as well as the Britannia Business Center II complex.
Both sold for less than their original value. Residential homes, however, saw a slight uptick. Pleasanton's forecasts were "pretty close," Wagner said. "We anticipated zero growth."
alameda county property assessments
City 2010-11 2011-12 Percent change
Alameda: $9,325,893,920 $9,452,764,771 1.36 percent
Albany: $1,923,568,649 $1,949,825,015 1.36 percent
Berkeley: $13,503,553,510 $13,898,473,845 2.92 percent
Dublin: $8,305,389,045 $8,482,846,995 2.14 percent
Emeryville: $4,190,790,315 $3,913,230,353 -6.62 percent
Fremont: $34,644,104,304 $34,122,490,940 -1.51 percent
Hayward: $15,052,324,745 $15,144,404,001 0.61 percent
Livermore: $13,242,040,030 $13,299,228,698 0.43 percent
Newark: $5,537,466,631 $5,572,210,275 0.63 percent
Oakland: $41,234,044,680 $41,920,715,595 1.67 percent
Piedmont: $3,027,278,586 $3,094,488,819 2.22 percent
Pleasanton: $17,326,290,380 $17,121,532,736 -1.18 percent
San Leandro: $9,654,888,215 $9,641,979,107 -0.13 percent
Union City: $7,849,794,994 $7,858,218,879 0.11 percent
*Unincorporated: $14,127,904,708 $14,239,266,288 0.79 percent
*Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, Hillcrest Knolls, San Lorenzo
Source: Alameda County Office of Assessor
The largest businesses in town are the ones who asked that their property values be assessed downwards in order to lower their property taxes and it's these same businesses that council members Davis and Brinkman just gave a giant thank you to in the form of yet another year of capped business license fees. Amazing. When these businesses stab you in the back like this, you'd think council members would think twice about yet another corporate give-away, but no, apparently Davis and Brinkman have never seen a corporate giveaway they didn't like.
ReplyDeleteI agree: Nora Davis and her yes man sidekick Kurt Brinkman are an embarrasement to Emeryville. We keep trying to build a nice city here and they keep dragging us down. It's time to jettison Nora Davis, her years in the sun are over.
ReplyDeleteWhat's the difference between Palo Alto and Emeryville?
ReplyDeletePalo Alto have just received $40 million in community benefits from Stanford University.
Emeryville Big Businesses:
The staff and council made ridiculous deals (giving away far too much) to corporations, developers, and the like. However, they did so in good faith, expecting to get a certain return from big business for the more than generous deals given. Has anyone at city hall heard of leasing land rather than giving it away?
Disney Pixar pays very little tax at the best of times, as its corporate office is now in Burbank, and also wants its taxes lowered.
It's time big businesses everywhere started to pay for the infrastructure that they use so heavily and support the state and nation; this includes Emeryville corporations.
One way to demonstrate that the companies here are keeping true to their original deals with the city would be to start really supporting the children at our schools, including those attending early education.
Any chance of corporate leadership here?
R.Major
R. Major-Thanks for the thoughtful insight. So far, Emeryville corporations give only pittances to the schools. The few meager crumbs thrown unfortunately are paraded around as proof of the wisdom of the City Hall/corporate nexus set up by the council majority. This council majority is selling the residents interests short. It's all quite cynical really. Emeryville is not a place the Emeryville corporations care about and the council isn't ready yet to make them care.
ReplyDelete