City To Encourage More Cars On Horton Street;
Bike Safety Endangered
The Bike/Pedestrian Committee voted three years ago, also unanimously, to limit the number of cars on Horton Street to no more than 3000 a day; the same as Berkeley has done, to encourage safe regional bike transportation. The City Council ignored the committee vote and widened Horton Street anyway during the Park Avenue street improvements last year. Now, all that's needed is to stripe in the extra vehicle lane and that's what the $50,000 is earmarked to do.
The staff report notes the street widening must be done for "public safety" and to improve the "quality of life".
The City has been reluctant to place more traffic on Hollis Street and has picked Horton to take up the slack regardless of clamoring from the bicycle community about safety concerns. The staff report, written by City Manager Pat O'Keeffe, went on to note the widening is needed because of the "cumulative traffic from approved projects" such as the Transit Center near the Amtrak station.
Horton Street has been extremely contentious over the years with the bike community and the business community both vieing for increased accessibility in a limited space. Bike advocates have noted that Horton Street remains the last viable quiet north/south corridor for bikes and they have openly postulated that Berkeley's Alta Planning and Design, the firm charged with writing the new Bike/Pedestrian Plan, will not be allowed to make objective findings owning to political pressure from the City to increase cars on the street. This latest move to earmark $50,000 seems to be the pressure foretold.
The City has shown its desire to widen Horton Street for some time. In anticipation of a future street widening, the staff overturned a Park Avenue Committee's vote to keep the sidewalks of Horton Street at least 12 feet wide several years ago. Later, the City found it needed to narrow the sidewalks a bit more to proporly accomadate the future street widening and the developer was given the go ahead to do so during construcion time, done without notifiying the Park Avenue Committee.
The city council will take public comment at a special Saturday January 22 meeting and make the final vote May 17th.
It's very obvious the city wants to make Horton Street for cars, not bikes. This is not a bad thing. They're making sure we don't add hurdles for business in this bad economic climate. Remember, this development can go to Oakland very easily. I think you should just accept this and try to figure a better place for the bikes. Bikes can still be accomadated, just not on Horton.
ReplyDeleteI'm in support of bicyclist's safety but in my experience driving thru Emeryville West of Hollis, they do not obey by the rules stated in the DMV handbook, especially obeying all stop signs. They blow right thru intersections! http://dmv.ca.gov/pubs/hdbk/shr_slow_veh.htm#bike
ReplyDeleteHey Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if you are familiar with Emeryville or the streets in question, but Horton is already a pretty out of the way route that was only ceded to bicycles as it was inefficient for pretty much everyone else. So to tell cyclists they can't even have just one bike oriented route throughout the city there is tantamount to saying get lost altogether. There is a more efficient auto centric route through the city one block east pm Hollis, so there is really no need for cars to bully their way onto Horton unless they have business there (ex office, condo, Amtrak, post office). The more daring cyclists still ride on Hollis as it is a straighter route with fewer stops, but the bikers who are less comfortable in heavy traffic or less annoyed by the stops and zig zags ride the Horton-Overland route.
To encourage more car traffic in a city already clogged by cars is stupid, and if you are concerned about the economy then the easiest way to get more employees and businesses into the city is to encourage them to travel via BART, bus, bike, or foot. I can assure you that from my personal experience, the extra $700 to $1000 per month they are now spending outside of Emeryville on their cars will turn into some discretionary dollars spent within the city. Plus, with more people on bikes and walking local businesses will inevitably spend less $$$ insuring their healthier employees.
Bernadette: First let's design and build some streets with biker's needs in mind, and then we can talk about who is not following the letter of the law. I can assure you that if car drivers ha to jump through as many hoops as cyclists do just to get around town there would be riots in the streets.