Search The Tattler

Sunday, March 5, 2023

Emeryville's Development Policy in Spray Paint

Here's What Happens When City Hall Fails to Protect Resident's Interests

Emeryville residents living in the San Pablo Avenue corridor, dismayed at the deterioration of their neighborhood by vandals who have been targeting the abandoned CVS Pharmacy building are now being told the City of Emeryville is powerless to stop it.  Graffiti is festooning the facades, vegetation is collapsing down onto the sidewalk and plywood panels have been ripped down.  The debasement of the neighborhood comes despite all the taxpayer money spent to improve and beautify the San Pablo streetscape because of a lack of will to hold businesses and developers to account by the City of Emeryville.

CVS quit Emeryville and closed down the business last September, leaving the building unattended and the City of Emeryville has no legally binding agreement from the Rhode Island based corporation to keep the property in decent shape upon their departure.  Emeryville’s Community Development Director Charley Bryant told the Tattler in December he is aware of the blight conditions at CVS but he is powerless to stop it, “We’re working with them” he has repeated since then, apparently hoping the corporate pharmacy giant will feel sorry for us and voluntarily clean up their property.  

City Hall is powerless because there is no one there that would rise up to hold a developer to account when approval is being sought for a proposed development.  A legally binding contract with teeth would hold developers to keep their property up to community standards after a client or the development corporation itself abandons the building.  But that would be considered a government constraint on a developer, something this city has not been comfortable with. 

Eventually, the property will be sold and some new developer will probably tear down the blighted monstrosity but until then, Emeryville residents will have to get used to their neighborhood brought low by a City Hall that works in the interest of business more than residents.  It's shown in Emeryville's development policy written in spray paint.




Vegetation is collapsing onto the sidewalk: ADA violation.


A look inside Emeryville's CVS Pharmacy building  
Editorial: It's warm and dry in here while outside people without homes huddle in the wet and cold. If developers abandon buildings and refuse to keep them up, Emeryville should take them over by eminent domain and provide a safe warm dry place for people without homes.

14 comments:

  1. Emeryville should have some ordinance regarding commercial property/ownership/property regulations? Other places I have lived will send a letter to the property owners giving them 30 days to clean up. If not clean within 30 days, they pay someone to do it and bill property owner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The key words you used are 'other places'. There is no will for this at our City Hall. It's been since September they have been "working on it". That's a long time to be working on something.

      So much 'work being done', so many calories expended by City Hall for so little action. The only real work being done here is by the vandals.

      Delete
  2. I know I don’t speak for all of Emeryville when I say this, but I saw the graffiti and thought it was kind of cool that kids found a canvas to make their street art. This was obviously done by kids who were looking for an outlet to express themselves. Calling them vandals is completely out of touch, especially by somebody who ran for school board in November.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is out of touch. I only vote for politicians that encourage graffiti. Emeryville dodged a bullit when they didn't elect this graffiti hater extremist. Luckily we didn't vote for him and we've kept the school board (and the city council) filled with graffiti lovers. Graffiti hating extremists are everywhere. They must be kept out of power or we could find ourselves in a graffiti free Emeryville God forbid.

      Delete
    2. I like it too. Its an improvement over blank boards. One day some of them will be doing murals.

      Delete
    3. I like it too. Its better than blank boards. One of these days some of these guys will be doing murals.

      Delete
  3. Those buildings are going to be demolished. No harm done, some nice artwork presented to the public. Private property owners of, say, fences and houses, should not be forced by law to pay for
    removal of graffiti. They're victims, not perps. Catching the sketchers on camera and making them restore the original
    surface or pay for its restoral would be a just way to deal with that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don’t get it, aren’t you an “artist”, Brian? Do you not acknowledge that street art is a viable aspect of art? Do you not recognize that graffiti is a form of art for the disenfranchised? Or is art just what is hanging in galleries for you?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Who is this guy who keeps trolling you Brian? He is so desperate to troll he has come out on the side of grafitti covering the town because you suggested it's not good. You should do a story about how nice babies, puppy dogs and rainbows are and watch him struggle to explain why they're terrible things to have in your town.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the support but don't feel that you need to defend me. I come from the end of the political spectrum that defends the interests of average people. People that do that get attacked from the other side, especially if they're effective.... it's to be expected. I've stuck my nose out, and now it'll get punched. I expect it and I can take it.

      Delete
    2. It's not just one guy.

      Delete
  6. You can be sure that if my duplex was covered in graffiti they would come after me with code enforcement and fines. Always easy to pick on the little guy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I've often thought that some of these vacated buildings could be used as homeless shelters. Bunk beds, showers, access to services. I also agree with Brian that businesses should be required to perform graffiti abatement and maintain their properties or face fines. If they chose to commission a mural ... from Emery High students (?)... right on! I'm all for intentional public art. Condoned murals tend to prevent this kind of vandalism.

    ReplyDelete
  8. https://www.dezeen.com/2023/03/13/shigeru-ban-architects-modular-shelters-victims-turkey-syria-earthquake/

    ReplyDelete