Council Majority Votes to Support YIMBY's Plan Over City's General Plan
Red Carpet to be Rolled Out For Developers
In a remarkable show of fraternity with corporate real estate interests, the Emeryville City Council majority voted to support the hand over of California cities’s autonomous public housing policies to private developers Tuesday night. The voting (4-1 Priforce dissenting) puts the City’s imprimatur squarely in the ‘hands off’ developers camp with its nod to near total deregulation of municipality's housing policy for the benefit of market forces. The vote shows a Council hostile to Emeryville's General Plan and a predilection to disallow Emeryville's residents a say so as the guiding principle for its housing policy in the future.
The new housing polity was forwarded in a series of affirmative votes, officially conjoining Emeryville with developer’s wishes, each in the same 4-1 fashion; a roll back of State planning protections for residents (AB 1307), a lowering citizen’s threshold vote from 2/3rds to 55% for development projects that would cost taxpayers money on infrastructure (ACA 1) and a bill that broadly deregulates the approval process for local municipalities, including a roll back of affordable housing construction regulation (SB 423).
Mayor John Bauters Emeryville's laws protecting housing must be "streamlined" to protect developers. |
The Council explained that community safeguards protected by Emeryville’s construction approval process need to be “streamlined” because “we are not building enough housing” and lowering the voter threshold for requiring taxpayers to foot the bill for public infrastructure improvements (coming as a result of private development) from the traditional 2/3rds to 55%, is OK because “it’s still democracy”.
The protections the Council showed animosity towards come at the expense of decades of community activism at the local and state level through changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Constitution of the State of California.
The developer and tech funded housing lobbying group YIMBY backed the votes taken by the City Council, applauding Emeryville for what they characterized as being sufficiently “pro housing”. YIMBY has been criticized by many housing equity organizations state-wide for equating its hands off developers campaigning with a lowering of the price of housing as a false narrative.
Affordable housing advocates refer to the YIMBY model as ‘trickle down housing’, recalling the Reagan era mantra of the discredited trickle down economics that was advertised as a way to buoy up the middle class. The idea is government provides tax cuts to wealthy people and corporations and their extra wealth will trickle down to poor people as corporations re-invest in their businesses, hiring more and wealthy people hire more servants and they stimulate the economy with their increased purchasing power. It is an idea Emeryville is doubling down on with Tuesday’s deregulation scheme.
Councilman Kalimah Priforce The four other Emeryville City Council members + Dianne Martinez are the "YIMBY 5". |
Council members Courtney Welch, David Mourra and Sukhdeep Kaur all followed Mayor John Bauters’ lead with the votes but Councilman Kalimah Priforce was adamant this was not a way forward towards equitable growth. Calling the four Council members plus newly appointed Planning Commissioner, the former City Councilwoman Dianne Martinez the “YIMBY Five”, Mr Priforce told the Tattler, “I want homeowners, renters, Community Based Organizations and City officials working together for an Emeryville free from developer control. The YIMBY Five think they know better than what the people want. I believe in placing the power back into the people’s hands so they can determine what true affordable housing is - not this trickle down housing.”
I don't get it- did the council vote on these state things? I thought the legislature voted on these.
ReplyDeleteThe Council voted to support these legislative bills, as in 'we like this'. These votes were very informative in that they leave no doubt now for the public as to the Council's views on Emeryville's General Plan and the wishes of the citizens. They showed us they don't care about either one of those things.
ReplyDeleteThe council is marching on with this YIMBY thing but they never asked us about it. I didn't vote for this. They didn't tell us this was how they were going to operate when they were asking us for our vote. I don't think this is something Emeryville people want. Brian makes a good point - we're getting all this housing but we're not getting parks or even ownership housing. We are not benefitting from this.
ReplyDeleteYes, and Bauters has publically mentioned nothing about eliminating the General Plan goals of more parks. What's so important about housing when all we are getting is rental units?! Rental units do not attract the kind of population that cares about the city and the schools. No one ever mentions the schools. They are what create permanent family residents here. The government always thinks in the short-term. A quality city can never be developed with short-term thinking. Rental housing only encourages temporary residents and those residents care nothing about the substantive life of the city.
ReplyDeleteGood for the council. More affordable housing for everyone. Happy to live in such a compassionate and open minded city.
ReplyDeleteThey're not open minded about our General Plan's provision that we increase the ratio of ownership housing over rental housing, are they? They are absolutely closed minded on that score. Not very compassionate to the democratic wishes of the people of Emeryville. It would be nice to have a truly open minded and compassionate City Council but alas....that's not the Council we have.
Delete