Emeryville Police Let a Shoplifting Suspect Walk Free
BevMo Store Manager Wanted to Press Charges But EPD Said NO
Citizens Reporting Crimes Should "Mind Their Own Frickin' Business" Says Sergeant
Officer body worn camera footage released by the Emeryville Police Department reveals how two officers and a sergeant recently let a shoplifting suspect walk free, ignoring the store manager’s request to prosecute. The minor shoplifting event happened on May 19th at the BevMo liquor store, 5717 Christie Ave in the Powell Street Plaza shopping mall, when a checkout clerk noticed a man walk out of the store without paying for a bottle of vodka. Police were summoned and the man was apprehended behind the store on Shellmound Street, drinking from the stolen bottle. After handcuffing the detained man and confiscating the stolen liquor, Emeryville Police Officer Andrew Selby attempted to return the bottle to the store clerk. After the clerk informed the officer BevMo could not take back an opened bottle, the officer poured out the vodka. Shortly after that, all three cops were alerted the store manager wished to press charges but ignoring that, the police removed the suspect from detention and released him.
Emeryville Police Officer Andrew Selby When told the BevMo store manager wanted to press charges against the shoplifter he responded, "Negative" and let the guy go free. |
A witness to the theft, the Emeryville Tattler editor produced a voice over narrative video of the crime scene after the police released the suspect and left the scene and sent that video out via email to the City Council members, key City staff and members of the police department. The Chief of Police, Jeff Jennings, a recipient of the emailed video, hit ‘reply all’ and then he denied the police had let the suspect go free and he reported that the manager of the BevMo refused to press charges, in direct contradiction of the body worn camera objective evidence. The Chief of Police, who earns over $200,000 per year incorrectly stated in his May 20th email responce, the EPD's hands were tied because “BevMo, the legal victim of this particular crime did not wish to prosecute the individual for the theft”. The email from the Chief was misleading about the store manager but it is unknown if the Chief was aware that his officers had failed to ask the store manager about his prosecution change of heart.
"Mind His Own Frickin' Business"
Emeryville Police Sergeant Michelle Shepherd Emeryville citizens who call in crimes should "Mind their own frickin' business". |
Regardless that the videos were released by EPD to fulfill a Tattler public records request, the last minute or so of the incident was cut from all three body worn cameras by EPD and not released. The expurgated section of the videos show the Tattler editor approaching the three departing officers, informing them that the store manager wished to press charges on the suspect. Officer Selby spoke for the group and said NO to that and then asked, “Don’t you have anything better to do with your time?”. The California Records Act requires government agencies to release in good faith, all requested public records, allowing for redaction of certain sensitive information. The failure of the EPD to release the full record on all three videos barring an explanation, represents a violation of the California Records Act. EPD has not provided an explanation about why the videos are edited in the way they are.
The Emeryville Chief of Police, Jeff Jennings was contacted for this story but he did not respond.
Below are two of the three videos the Tattler obtained in our public records request. The last minute or so of incriminating evidence against EPD was cut from all three videos by EPD but plenty of incriminating evidence remains. The first is from Officer Selby's body worn camera and the second one is from Sergeant Shepherd. The sound takes a minute to begin. Transcripts are posted below.
Extra Reading:
Below are partial transcripts from the Selby and Shepherd videos. The characters are: the Suspect, the BevMo Store Clerk, the Tattler Editor (the reporting party who made the call to the police and was a witness to the crime, the Police Dispatcher, Sergeant Michelle Shepherd, Officer Andrew Selby and Officer Kyle Rice.
Selby Video
.55-1:05
Selby to Tattler Editor: They [Bevmo] don’t want to press charges.”
Tattler Editor to Selby: “I’m going to go complain to them.”
2:45-2:57
Tattler editor to Selby: “I’m going to request they press charges.”
3:08-3:25
Tattler Editor to BevMo Store Clerk: “Will you press charges?”
BevMo Store Clerk to Tattler Editor: “We probably can’t, to be honest.”
Tattler Editor to BevMo Store Clerk: “Can you tell your boss [Store Manager] I request you press charges?”
Convo fades out as Selby moves outside to pour out opened vodka bottle.
During this time the Store Manager tells the Tattler Editor he will press charges (no police present to hear it).
5:35-5:42
Rice to Selby: “Where’d the RP [reporting party Tattler Editor] go?”
Selby to Rice “Into BevMo to complain.”
5:50-6:01
Dispatcher to Selby (and Shepherd and Rice): “Apparently Donahue (Tattler Editor) went into BevMo, spoke to BevMo and now they’re reconsidering pressing charges.”
“Selby (to himself or maybe Rice): “Negative.”
6:15-6:25
Rice to Selby: "You want to cut him [Suspect] loose?”
Selby to Rice: “Yeah”
Shepherd Video:
2:02-2:11
Shepherd to Suspect: "You've got some nice threads on - nice shoes. Did you take those?"
Suspect to Shepherd: "No"
Shepherd to Suspect: "The price tags are still on."
4:06-4:09
Shepherd to Suspect: "Hopefully we'll be out of your hair soon."
4:45-5:20
Shepherd to Suspect: “Was that guy [Tattler Editor] bugging you? The big white guy?”
Suspect to Shepherd: “No…(unintelligible)”. He mentioned how the Tattler Editor had offered him money to pay for the vodka.
Radio from Dispatcher cuts in to all three police; “Apparently Donahue went into BevMo, spoke to BevMo and now they're reconsidering pressing charges.”
Shepherd in responce to hearing that: “No”
Rice heard on radio, talking to Dispatcher: “Negative. I talked to the store and they do not want to proceed. And you don’t need to talk to Donahue anymore regarding this call.”
Shepherd to Suspect (continuing convo from before Dispatcher interruption): “No, that guy [Tattler Editor] was here making things worse for you. He needs to mind his own frickin’ business.”
5:42-5:55
Shepherd coaches Suspect on how to get away with shoplifting better in the future. She speaks to him about his new clothing with the price stickers still on.
Shepard to Suspect: “A way not to draw attention to yourself when you walk into these stores around here is taking off the stickers. People see it and they’re like, he’s gunna steal from us. It’s a tell tale sign.”
Suspect to Shepherd: "All right. Thank you."
Most Excellent ¿
ReplyDeleteOK let me be the first to say it--- This is so wrong.
ReplyDeleteThanks to Brian for letting us know about this and telling BevMo to stop being part of the shoplifting problem and start being a good business community neighbor. But to the police department---what are you guys doing? The only way we get past this epidemic of shoplifting is to get the businesses and the police to support the community that has had ENOUGH!
Sorry the officer cussed at you, that's the downside, but I think the police were right to consider the store employe's initial NO on pressing charges for such a small incident. The courts and the jails can barely handle the serious cases they're overloaded with.
ReplyDeleteSergeant Shepard didn't cuss at me. She did reveal what she thinks about citizens calling in small crimes...and that is she doesn't like it. Unless we are believe she was "being sarcastic". It would appear the other two police officers were also not happy getting the call about "one bottle" as Officer Selby put it.
DeleteTo your other point; maybe it's true... maybe small crimes are not worth pursuing. A highly attenuated cost/benefit analysis could possibly reveal that. But that's not what the police department says. They tell us to report all crime we see. 'See something, say something' they tell us.
And then there's the other matter of the police department refusing a request to prosecute a criminal coming from a crime victim. That is counter to their charge. They are here, they are paid to prosecute criminals. If they say NO to that based on the size of the crime as they see it, then we have to start serious questioning about what they're even doing here. If the police department doesn't want to prosecute small crimes, they need to tell us that and then they need to change the law to make small crimes legal so they're not in violation of their solemn duty. They walk around with guns and the right to arrest and use lethal force in our name. They need to be totally transparent.
OMG thanks for sharing! This literally had me laughing out loud. I replayed the clip of Brian Donahue whining "They're not pressing charges?" several times. Classic. Glad I wasn't the BevMo manager on the receiving end of his bullying, but this is eminently amusing for everyone else. :)
ReplyDeleteIt was less whining and more demanding….closer to bullying than whining. You should make up your mind though. Was I whining or bullying? Because the two terms are self canceling. Read the following and then you can weigh in.
DeleteThe Store Manager at first didn’t want to press charges against the shoplifter because BevMo has a corporate policy against prosecuting small scale shoplifting he told me. But I insisted, telling him Emeryville does not appreciate these corporate chain stores not helping us fight the increasing crime in our city. I told the Manager BevMo needs to join with the residents and become part of the solution to crime instead just being the problem. I said BevMo should work with the Emeryville residents and the police to stop the growing shoplifting problem. I said with BevMo being a locus of crime, criminals are emboldened to commit crimes all over our town. Ironically, Emeryville police agree with me on this…at least up until May 19th.
BevMo and many other corporate chains have worked shoplifting into their business model and that's why they generally don't prosecute. But the whole city is brought down by this cynical corporate anti-neighborly recalcitrance. You and I are harmed by this.
The Manager finally relented and agreed to press charges against the shoplifter. I didn’t whine…it was closer to bullying. I call it persuading but you can call it what you will.
But you should know my requesting corporate retailers prosecute against thieves is an example of citizen engaged community policing. It's called ‘community policing’ because it involves the whole community; the residents, the businesses and the police.
Emeryville police have said they encourage community policing but this unfortunate BevMo incident puts that into question. Look out for a future Tattler story on this.
Thanks for commenting.
It's obvious these cops didn't want to arrest this shoplifter. The only reason they wouldn't want to do it is because it's so minor. So that makes sense but I do think they should be more forthcoming. Your headline is accurate because they did let this guy go. Now you need to find out exactly why. And I don't like all the unprofessional behavior from Shepard.
ReplyDeleteYour hater is really trolling. What's wrong with you asking them if they're going to press charges. Why is that funny? I think what you did was good. I agree these corporate retail stores need to start helping by pressing charges against shoplifters. The 12:29 guy thinks that's laughable.
ReplyDeleteThe chief of police tried to put a happy face on this but the videos are clear the police officers involved did not want to prosecute. If they did or even if they were open and neutral they would have asked the manager if they changed their mind as they were told he did. How hard would it have been for the police to simply ask the manager?
ReplyDeletehttps://evilleeye.com/news-commentary/commentary/councilmembers-brothertattler-editor-brian-donahue-goes-on-small-business-harrasment-spree/
ReplyDelete