Search The Tattler

Sunday, December 29, 2024

John Bauters Era Ends: a Consequential Council Member Retires

 The End of the 'Bauters Era'

Housing Development Corporations Benefited Tremendously Under Bauters But

Residents Saw Little Benefit, Mostly Rising Problems

John Bauters stepped down from the Emeryville City Council December 10th as a necessary result of him choosing to run a campaign for Alameda County Supervisor.  That race ended in a November 5th loss and finished an eight year political career for the undisputed leader of Emeryville.  

Stripped of power and now just a private citizen, it's a good time to reflect on John Bauters’ tenure as our leader; the man who for better or worse, ran the ‘Bauters Era’ for our town.


First running a losing campaign for the City Council as a conservative in 2014, Bauters tried again as a progressive in 2016 and won after having received the endorsement of the popular center left residential activist group Residents United for a Livable Emeryville (RULE).  After taking office, he quickly repositioned himself as a conservative in the mold of his mentor, the former leader of Emeryville, Nora Davis.  Both Ms Davis and Mr Bauters unabashedly led Emeryville by embracing a top down, pro-corporate, private sector deregulation governing philosophy.  For Council member Davis it was a pro-development-of-any-kind philosophy and for Council member Bauters it was a pro-housing developer philosophy.  Both leaders took a hands off approach to corporate developers seeking profit maximization in our town.  As a result, with Ms Davis in control, Emeryville delivered three major suburban style auto-centric shopping malls and the giant campus closed to the public Pixar while Mr Bauters delivered the ubiquitous seen-one-you've-seen-them-all rental apartment blocks.  Notably, John differed from Councilwoman Davis insofar as he likes to ride his bike.

Emeryville's Homelessness During the Bauters Era
Numbers of Individuals
79% drop since 2019 but 31% increase since 2016.
He only told  Alameda County voters about his 
2019-2024 numbers, failing to tell about 
his 2016-17 numbers.
Source: Alameda County '24 PIT count

Flowing from this pro-developer epistemological polity, many of the things people in Emeryville like have been delegated to second tier status; things like creating new parks, creating housing for families, locally serving storefront retail and creating a city of homeowners versus renters.  Because housing developers would have to pay for them, these are things developers don’t want and as a result, these are things not delivered on Mr Bauters’ watch.  For the record, Bauters himself says he’s a YIMBY Council member.  The San Fransisco Chronicle agreed, as revealed in their story where they called our Councilman “The most YIMBY mayor in the most YIMBY city in California”. 

There were some positive things Council member Bauters brought.  He is a very effective speaker and able to effectively galvanize people when he needs to.  Early in his first term, Bauters staged community building citizen appreciation events at the Council meetings where individual citizens would be called up to the podium and awarded plaques of appreciation from the City of Emeryville for their public good works.  He pushed through a taxpayer funded $50 million affordable housing bond to try to ameliorate the gentrifying effects of all the market rate luxury apartments developers like to build.  But conspicuously, it has just been all-rental apartments, all the time.

A good way to recount the adverse effects of the Bauters Era on those living here is to simply tally the most egregious negativity he delivered:

1)   He rolled back the wages of the poorest working poor among us when he rolled back our minimum wage.

2)  He said NO to any new parks until there is enough rental housing built (but he has refused to tell us how much housing we need).  

3)  Going against our General Plan, he transformed Emeryville from a city of homeowners into a city of renters.

4)  Siding with the corporate Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) developer lobbying group YIMBY, he has moved against local control of our housing policy in order to hand it over to corporations.

5)  After turning us into a city of renters, he has stopped all attempts to empower renters seeking rent stabilization or rent control (because developers are against it).

6)  After agreeing to allow a code of ethics law for Emeryville, he has said NO to allowing an independent ethics commission to ensure the new law is not politicized and applied fairly and equitably.

7)  As chair of the Budget and Governance Committee for eight consecutive years, he failed due diligence and brought the worst budget deficit in Emeryville history.

8)  In order to facilitate a proposed all-rental housing project, the ill fated 700’ tall ‘Onni Tower’, he proposed a roll back two of Emeryville’s new ordinances meant to ameliorate the ill effects of developer greed: the tower separation ordinance and the unit mix ordinance. 

9)  After pushing through a Council resolution to support Ukraine from Russian aggression, he said NO to a call for a Gaza ceasefire resolution.

10)  He intervened and stopped our democratic mayoral rotation in order to take a second term for himself, stating he is needed because of his budget expertise (and then he blow up the deficit).

Homelessness in Emeryville
as candidate John Bauters reported
it to the voters.
 
He did a great job he said.
But something critical is missing
from this narrative.
After suffering through all this corporatist anti-resident Bauters Era politics, Emeryville residents watched as candidate Bauters in November told Alameda County residents he had reduced homelessness in Emeryville by 79%.  The un-cherry picked facts reveal he INCREASED homelessness in Emeryville by 31% over the course of his tenure on our Council.  Bauters only told about homelessness dropping since 2019, skipping over the previous four years of homelessness increasing while he was in command.  The rest of Alameda County also followed the same trend: homelessness went down recently after having increased previously.  In this way, homelessness in Emeryville is not unique in the Bay Area.  But that was not something Mr Bauters wanted to tell.  Further, homelessness in Emeryville is much lower than neighboring Oakland because the police here roust them out before they get a chance to set up an encampment, a policy highlighted by the Tattler in a series of articles in 2022, an inconvenient fact for candidate Bauters.

Perhaps the most disturbing development at the Council in the Bauters Era is the new zero accountability, zero transparency culture.  Like Council members Courtney Welch and Sukhdeep Kaur after him, Bauters refused to answer questions from his constituents (if the questions are tough).  He refused to answer emails, texts or calls.  Adding to this, he refused to hold press conferences, and as a result, the people never got any accountability from him.  Mr Bauters, seeking bigger political office after Emeryville, protected his brand and his narrative at all costs, eschewing any negativity that could rub off on him were he to have engaged with his constituents or the press.  So far Courtney Welch is following this same path. Notably, Nora Davis did not see her role as a public servant like Bauters and Welch do: Council member Davis took questions and comments from all comers; a tradition of public accountability that sadly has died with Bauters.

Emeryville has the unfortunate distinction that it regularly falls victim to a ‘strongman’ culture at City Hall.  After the fall of the criminally corrupt John LaCoste era of the 70’s, Emeryville has had three multi-year leaders.  Two of the three have been pro-corporate, pro-developer conservatives.  The three have been Nora Davis, conservative, 25 years in power (four in the wilderness), Jac Asher, progressive, 5 years in power followed by Bauters, conservative, eight years in power.  Council member Bauters has groomed the conservative, pro-developer Courtney Welch to be our new leader but it is not clear during this interregnum period if that will become our continuing illiberal future.  

Over the last 38 years, other than the few short years with a progressive in power, conservative politics here have resulted in a corporate retail chain store and traffic clogged city with the fewest acres of parks per resident of any town in the Bay Area.  Emeryville is the largest town without a library in the Bay Area, it has the lowest percentage of families of any town in the East Bay, and the highest rate of renters over homeowners in the East Bay.  Emeryville’s renter residents live alone and cut off from a community due to the auto centric nature of our town.  At 1.8 people per housing unit, Emeryville has the lowest number of people per housing unit in the East Bay.  In a town like this, without an engaged citizenry, it’s not surprising Emeryville has the second worse school district in the East Bay.  This is the legacy of the Bauters Era.

Former Emeryville City Council member
John Bauters
2016-2024

Back in 2026?


25 comments:

  1. When min wage was rolled back, it was for local businesses and restaurants with less than 50 employees. John Bauters was soooo bad that despite the rollback at that time, emeryville still had a higher minimum wage than San Francisco and Oakland.

    John Bauters was soooo bad that even now, Emeryville has the highest minimum wage in California and one of the top 10 in the U.S.

    John Bauters was soooo bad that Emeryville currently still tops minimum wage than San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, alameda.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Emeryville now has the high minimum wage because the Alameda County Labor Council and the people of Emeryville fought Bauters back and they made him concede and reverse his new ordinance that rolled back the wages. The poorest workers in Emeryville were going to have their wages cut by Bauters. He tried to make the roll back stick but people power restored our minimum wage law. He learned the hard way not to mess with unions in a town that honors labor.

      Delete
    2. It’s not “Emeryville now has the highest minimum wage.” Emeryville always had a higher minimum wage versus the other cities even before the rollback. This is easily confirmed online so stop propagating disinformation to readers.

      Delete
    3. Careful how you wield those quotation marks there, Bub. Remember, everything within the quotation marks must be verbatim. Please go back and check your work.

      Delete
    4. This troll guy you cultivated over the last few articles is such an assclown. Your quotation marks retort should have ended him. He was owned at that moment but guys like this won't be stopped. The doubling down comes next. What a schlemiel.

      Delete
    5. lol instead of kissing Donahue’s ass, why don’t you look up the minimum wage for Emeryville and the surrounding cities in the year the rollback? Before July and after July.

      You’re welcome.

      Delete
    6. Lol? I’m not sure what you’re talking about. It seems like you’re suggesting I’m trying to conceal something. Instead of talking in coded language, why not come out and say what’s on your mind? Council member Bauters led a drive to roll back Emeryville’s minimum wage ordinance and he was successful at that. His work was undone after more than 800 people in Emeryville signed a ballot initiative petition and that stopped Bauters. This is historically factual.

      If you are saying Emeryville shouldn’t have a minimum wage ordinance, why not come out and say it? There are plenty of Republicans and corporate Democrats that would agree with that. If you’re saying Bauters didn’t attempt to roll back the minimum wage very much and that maybe he should have rolled it back farther, again, you’d have people agree with you on that. This is what it most seems to me that you are trying to say. That and saying he should have gotten rid of the minimum wage in Emeryville entirely are perfectly legitimate public policy opinions.

      But if you are denying he did it, you should be arguing with Bauters himself. Because Bauters himself admits he did it. During the election, Councilman Bauters apologized to the Alameda County Democratic Party for attempting to roll back Emeryville’s minimum wage.

      If a person recognizes that Council member Bauters attempted to roll back Emeryville’s minimum wage, they have not kissed my ass. They have simply acknowledged fact. They are in the fact based community. If you’re a fact denier, you’re welcome here at the Tattler but you’re probably not welcome too many other places in the Bay Area.

      Thanks for commenting and please feel free to say what you mean more freely here.

      Delete
    7. Brian- Lol! What'd I say about this assclown? It's the same guy over and over. Might even be Bauters himself.

      Delete
    8. Lol, let me blow your mind Tattler reader, it's not the same guy! There isn't one troll going around shitting on Brian's blog, there's multiple trolls shitting on Brian's blog. At least we have enough sense to stop trolling by 7:18pm on New Year's Eve!

      Delete
    9. Pretty pathetic. It's obviously the same trolling commentor realizing the jig is up that they're the same person. We all know it's the same troll - a Bauters loyalist/fan.

      Delete
    10. LOL, what jig are you talking about? You know it's possible to dislike both Bauters and Brian, right? The ego on both those guys is gross. And if the thought of hating Brian is new to you, get off this blog and talk to your Emeryville neighbors. There's more than just me, he even said that he's not in this to make friends.

      Delete
    11. Feel free to hate me all you like Mr Anonymous (SG?); lots of Republicans and corporate Democrats sure do. But remember, to hate me means you also must hate street trees (I was instrumental, the sole initiator in getting Emeryville’s Urban Forestry Ordinance considered and then passed by the Council). You also must hate Emeryville’s bike boulevard network (again, me and some fellow bike enthusiasts in the first BPAC got that done). You must also hate the Emeryville Greenway (again I was one of six citizens who got the Council to convert the former rail tracks to a bike/ped path). You’re also going to have to hate the Park Avenue Beautification Project (me and four others who were in the initial group of citizens that got the Council to initiate that). You're also going to have to hate Emeryville’s 1% for the Arts Program (I was in the first group of citizens that pushed for that….thanks especially for Council member Greg Harper who really helped). You’re also going to have to hate the South Bayfront Bike/Ped Bridge (again, I was part of a group of 5 citizens that started that project…and special thanks to Council member John Fricke who championed it).

      That’s a lot of hating you’re going to have to do. But I’m sure you’re up for it.

      Delete
    12. Again, it's not just me that's up for it, there's also everybody in Emeryville that never voted for you. Think about it, all those great things you mentioned above and you can't manage to even get chosen to be in a small town school board? Why is that? 43 years in an area with a highly visible blog, name recognition, and everything you've done for Emeryville, and nothing? You should have gotten votes without even trying after 43 years of living here. But I get it, you're not in this to make friends.

      Delete
    13. I'm not interested in being in power. I'm interested in reporting on power.

      Delete
  2. Wow. The homelessness issue is crazy. He duped everyone including me on that. Thanks for setting us straight but you should have told us this before the election. He almost won!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah John Bauters, Courtney. Why don’t you respond to Brian’s text messages? Let Brian slide into your DM. He slides into Kalimah Priforce’s DM all the time. Slide for public accountability!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for providing the information about the politicians in Emeryville they will never give us. Local press is necessary and lacking most everywhere now. I notice you didn't get Bauters to comment for the story. No surprise after reading the article.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't think its fair to call John a "conservative". He is actually quite progressive. He's just not an extremist like Bas.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Elisabeth MontgomeryDecember 30, 2024 at 8:40 AM

    End of an Era. So we begin anew. How can we vote to change Eville City? Start with an updated survey of what residents want and need. Then follow that advice.
    1) Build citywide “Commons-spaces” for parks with interactive, habitat restoration educational spaces.
    2) Handle and solve the “left in shambles” budget.
    3) Support the extraordinary enthusiasm of Emery High (K-12) new Principal Kebbie Cleiman and how to generate a reputation for education excellence. Implement a local, school to work job shadow and internship programs for our high school juniors and seniors.
    4) Strengthen the Legacy Small Businesses in the City and unite for federal and state funding.
    5) Continue attracting families and making affordable housing for them.
    Foundational to all of this is oversight use for our Code of Ethics (overhaul and upgrade the existing, easy to weaponize CofE)
    Vote!
    Thank you Tattler.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The city of Emeryville will not improve and positively evolve until it cares for and embraces its schools. Schools are what bring permanent residents who buy into the city. We now have a new school principal, Kibby Kleiman, who is ready to develop Emeryville schools to an international level of competence and creativity. In the past, our city council has turned its back on our school system, completely severing it from governmental accountability and concern. Schools create the backbone of any city who desires permanent residents. Emeryville has no substantive residential future until it integrates and ignites its schools. Schools and the business and residential community must unify.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The City of Emeryville invested heavily in the school district by co-creating ECCL, putting up a great deal of money to integrate school and city activities, developing a joint MOU, and generally working more closely with a school district than any other city in CA. If it isn't functioning as integrated as possible elect and hire school and city officials who will exercise that leadership.

      Delete
    2. ECCL was created as a joint, integrated project of the school district and City. The City invested a huge amount of money, staff time, energy, developed an operational joint MOU. We need leaders to uphold that integration on the council and school board.

      Delete
  8. Dave Mourra will be a wonderful mayor in this new era. It’s clear why council voted for him as vice mayor over Kalimah Priforce, and now mayor. Mourra has the integrity and skills to get things done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What does this have to do with John Bauters? And please tell us what things is Dave Mourra going to get done now that you've highjacked to comment section.

      Delete
  9. Creating a school with a design suitable for a prison is the so-called "vision" the city's government had at the time of the ECCL's conception and implementation. The ECCL is an amateurish, sterile, and clumsy architectural work, most certainly a far cry from an inspiring and creatively invigorating educational environment that we so desperately need. The ECCL is proof that the city's implied educational aspirations are demeaning, dehumanizing, and shortsighted.

    ReplyDelete