John Bauters: Tattler City Council Candidate's Questionnaire

The Tattler queried the four Emeryville City Council candidates running in the November 4th election on topics of the day and all four responded.  We asked five questions of each candidate and readers wishing background information on each question may preview the primer HERE.  We will present each survey respondent every day or so in alphabetical order.  Emeryville voters will select two from the four.  First up in the cue is candidate John Bauters:

John Bauters: Candidate for City Council
Candidate's website: HERE

1)  Will you vote for, support and/or endorse Emeryville Measures U&V? Yes or no please.  If yes why and if no why not?
I will be voting "yes" on Measures U & V.  Becoming a charter city under Measure U, which some residents may know as "local rule" or "local control" empowers local residents with the right to self-governance.  Under our current general law status, everything from the composition and structure of our local government to the way we administer many of our local affairs is dictated by a set of default state laws in the California Government Code.  Opponents to Measure U will claim that a future City Council could propose higher salaries for itself or that residents could propose to exclude certain types of businesses from operating within the city.  That much is true: the Council or resident groups can propose a variety of things. What isn't made clear to voters is that in order for any of those things to happen, it requires the approval of you, the Emeryville voter.  The importance of self-governance cannot be understated.  I hope residents will support Measure U.

Measure V is a separate ballot measure that levies a property transfer tax.  This tax only occurs at the time property is sold,  It is not an annual tax like property or parcel taxes.  Budgeting for the city's needs takes long-term planning.  As we grow our resident base, the demand for services will grow.  Historically, we have had top-notch public safety personnel and community infrastructure.  Without redevelopment funds available, the city needs to diversify the way it continues to meet the need for resident services like these.  Most other cities already do this and the rate proposed in Measure V ($12 per $1,000 in value) is lower than all of our surrounding neighbors. This will help us keep Emeryville's services at the high standard we have all come to enjoy.


2)    Do you support Emeryville’s Pedestrian/Bicycle Plan as it pertains to the Horton Street Bike Boulevard?  Would you weaken the Plan or would you defend it as it is?  
I generally support the current bicycle-pedestrian plan as it pertains to Horton Street.  I am a resident of the Park Avenue District and walk Horton Street as much as four times a day between walks with my dog, King, and my commute to and from the Amtrak station.  I have attended several community stakeholder meetings focused on reducing automobile traffic and speeds on Horton Street.  Horton Street is currently at "level 3" of the options available under the plan for remediating the number of car trips per day and speeds that exceed the standards set for a Bicycle Boulevard.

I understand that the Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee has recommended that the city implement "level 5" traffic calming measures which involve, in part, total diversion of automobile traffic from Horton Street at several locations, including a diverter at the corner of Sherwin and Horton.  This will result in all northbound traffic being rerouted west from Horton onto Sherwin Street and then out onto Hubbard and Halleck Streets.  I believe that skipping the viable options available to us at level 4 in favor of these dramatic measures would be a mistake.  Displacing automobile traffic into a residential neighborhood without a holistic, comprehensive plan to address the issue systemically solves little for us.  Calming measures that are less-intrusive than full diverters can positively reduce the number of drivers who choose Horton Street as well as reduce speeds without displacing the problem upon other residents within our community.  I would like to see the Park Avenue District, Transportation, Public Works and Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee work together to develop a comprehensive proposal for solutions that integrate feedback from all stakeholders.

3)  In the future, how should the City guarantee independently owned and locally serving (non-formula) retail associated with residential and commercial development projects, if at all?

There are a number of ways to promote independently owned and local small business growth within the city.  In order to mitigate the costs associated with renting retail space in our mixed-use developments, we should be reducing or waiving licensing fees for small businesses in their first year, or providing pro-rated or step-up fees for local businesses that need start-up growth opportunities.  Doing this will free up capital that can be used toward rent and business development.  Reducing impact fees for developers who rent retail spaces to local business at a reduced rate is another idea we could explore.  As a resident in one of the city's few work-live buildings, I know we have many talented residents with services to offer the local community.  I would like to see us engage our entrepreneurial residents and small business owners to identify what would make owning and operating a small business within the city profitable for them.

4)  How do you define family friendly housing for Emeryville?  How do we get it?  How much is needed?

The term "family-friendly housing" is a component of a bigger concept: "family-friendly community."  The latter connotes a more complete environment that appeals to families and includes housing, schools, parks, recreational centers and other services commonly sought by families.  Emeryville is in the process of evolving into a more family-friendly community.  Projects like the ECCL are an example of efforts toward that end.  Unlike many of the other attributes of family-friendly communities, housing is not as flexible as other parts of the community.  Once housing is built, its composition and structure often appeal to a specific demographic.  In Emeryville, the balance of housing options weighs against families right now.  This will be a massive challenge for the city in the coming years as it tries to become a more family-friendly community: few sites suitable for this type of development remain available for our future use; current development proposals favor rental housing over home ownership options; and developers aren't proposing multi-bedroom housing because it is less profitable to them.  The question: "How will we get it?" is an extremely difficult one to answer in light of the foregoing challenges I outlined.  The best chance we have to build family-friendly housing is through the development of strong relationships with developers who focus on family-sized housing options and finding ways to incentivize projects here.  I work closely with nonprofit affordable housing developers who build family-friendly housing as part of my daily job.  Consulting the expertise of people who build this type of housing is the best way for us to identify potential solutions that will incentivize family-friendly development in light of the challenges we face.

5)  Should the City encourage residents to enter into Community Benefits Agreements (CBA's) with large development projects? How?  

I think that the city can promote Community Benefits Agreements ("CBA") by encouraging interested citizen groups and prospective developers to engage one another during the pre-application process for new development.  Notifying residents and developers alike of the opportunity to engage with one another during the pre-applicaiton process is a healthy way for the city to promote dialogue between the parties.  The city's interest in securing agreement between residents and developers prior to application review must be balanced against the city's important function as an impartial decision-maker to any application before it.  To that end, I do not believe that the city should play any role in negotiating the terms of a CBA, nor should it take sides or offer incentives as part of that process.  Because negotiating a CBA is only worthwhile if it ultimately contains terms that are enforceable, it is imperative that residents who pursue them do so with expert legal consultation.  Involving the city directly could undermine the legality of the agreement itself and jeopardize the right residents might otherwise have to enforce it against a developer alleged to be in breach of the terms.

RULE Survey: Emery School Board Candidate John Affeldt

Residents United for a Livable Emeryville (RULE), a public citizens activist group that works for Emeryville resident empowerment, interviewed all four candidates running for the Emery School Board in the November 4th election.  Below, the Tattler presents the first in a four part series presenting the Emery School Board candidates participating in the RULE survey.  The four will be highlighted in alphabetical order, running every other day in the Tattler (or thereabouts).

Emery School Board Candidate John Affeldt

John Affeldt is currently an Emery School Board member, appointed to the position in July 2012.  This will be Mr Affeldt's first time facing Emeryville voters in a School Board election.  The voters are to pick from three of the four candidates running.  Here are John Affeldt's answers to the RULE survey:

1. What is your view of charter schools? How should the District respond to any applications it might receive to create a charter school within District boundaries?

Any applications received must be reviewed objectively according to the statutory requirements.  My personal view of charters is that they best function as pockets of experimentation to generate innovative practices which can then be taken back for use in the traditional public school setting.  Such was the original intention behind charters when they were originated in the early 1990’s as a result of advocacy from the American Federation of Teachers.  I do not see charters, as some do, as an alternative to the public school system.  Charters have not been good at creating sustainable systems of schools that have successfully been able to educate “all comers,” particularly all the low-income students, English learners and students with disabilities that public schools accept.  As for Emeryville in particular, we are small enough that we ought to be able to experiment and innovate within the traditional public school model.

2. What, in your view, is the primary mission of the District?

The primary mission of the District is the same one that is in our State Constitution and which I have fought to enforce as an education advocate statewide for the last 23 years:  to provide every child with an education that provides them with the opportunity to participate successfully in our economy, in our democratic and civic institutions, and in our diverse society. 

3. As an individual trustee, how would you want to interact with

teachers? Would you want to meet with teachers as a group, individually, and if so, how frequently? Or would you primarily rely on the superintendent or public Board meetings to communicate with teachers?

As a board member, I have regularly engaged in conversations with teachers that I know and see on a day-to-day basis in classrooms, in the hall, or at School site council meetings.  I have responded positively to every invitation I have received from teachers for after-hours meetings, be it for beers at Lanesplitters, a retirement party, or a ball game.  Where necessary, I have reached out to teacher leadership to keep communication lines open.

4. What is the appropriate role of standardized tests? How would you use the scores? Should scores be used to evaluate the performance of

administrators or teachers?

Standardized test scores are an important but imperfect indicator of student growth in learning.  Important judgments about students, teachers, or schools should not be based solely on standardized test scores.  Rather, any such judgments should be based on multi-dimensional, holistic evidence of student, teacher, or school performance.  I have been a supporter of California’s recent shift away from a test-centric accountability system to a more multi-dimensional one.  See a blog I wrote (http://edsource.org/2013/california-moving-away-from-washingtons-corporate-education-reform/36465#.U8rjxmK9KSM) and a list of principles I helped draft as part of the 100-member national Coalition for Teaching Quality which I helped form.  Principle 3 addresses teacher evaluation. (http://www.publicadvocates.org/sites/default/files/library/principles_to_ensure_student_access_to_fully_prepared_and_effective_teachers.pdf); also see generally www.coalitionforteachingquality.org. 

5. In recent years the District has fired or reduced the hours of some

staff in favor of outsourcing school services such as the breakfast and

lunch programs. When is it appropriate to outsource an existing school

service? What factors should guide these decisions?

The primary factor is always what is in the best interest of our students’ education.  Board members need constantly to analyze how the District can best maximize students’ educational opportunities.  Food service, for example, is a cost that is not fully covered by federal and state funds and by students who pay for meals.  Thus, the cost of meals “encroaches” on the District’s general fund and the educational programs we provide.  In order to maximize our instructional services, it has made sense to look to less expensive alternative ways to provide high quality, nutritional meals to our students.

6. What role should a Trustee play in District fund-raising from

businesses, non-profits, and grant-making institutions?

Board members can play an effective role in serving as a cheerleader for the District; this can include raising funds from outside entities like businesses or foundations.  I have reached out to foundation funders that I know on the District’s behalf where appropriate and have participated in helping to brief a funder on the District’s vision and programs.

7. The District controls three properties. How should it allocate

resources amongst these properties? Assuming the completion of the Emeryville Center of Community Life (ECCL) in 2016 and the use of the San Pablo Avenue site for K-12 instruction and administrative offices, what should the District do with the Anna Yates and Ralph Hawley sites?

Before I joined the Board, the Ralph Hawley site was designated for 0-5 preschool educational activities by the Board.  As such it is currently housing a very strong YMCA Head Start program.  The precise use of the current Anna Yates site is still under consideration.  Some of the ideas that I have heard floated include post-secondary job-training programs, housing County Office of Education teacher training programs, additional after-school and recreation program space and a future K-3 or K-5 site should the ECCL site become over-subscribed down the line, among others.  The District and the City have appointed a Task Force largely made up of community members to make recommendations regarding the future possible uses for the Anna Yates site and of the current Rec Center site post-ECCL.  That work has currently been put on hold while the City considers its priorities.  However we precisely proceed, the vision should be one in which we utilize all three sites to support the broader educational needs of our whole community, from preschool through to K-12 and beyond, if possible.

8. Should Emeryville schools receive contributions directly, or should they be managed by a third party?

Whatever maximizes support for the District and our students.  It seems, for example, that the Emery Ed Fund has often been an effective conduit for increasing business and at times foundation support for the District.  If a funder prefers to contribute directly to the District and that can be accomplished effectively, then that route makes sense.

Letter to the Tattler: John Affeldt

Emery School Board member John Affeldt responds to the September 27th story about the November Measure K parcel tax ballot initiative.  Readers may wish to read the rebuttal (below and in the comment section) after reading Mr Affeldt's letter. 

To the Tattler-

I’d like to respond to the points you raise [in your story 'Emery School District Botches Measure K Parcel Tax Rollout'] .  These are my own views on the matter.  I have not discussed this response with other board members and it is not an “official” district response.

Your assertion that "some classes at [Anna Yates] this year have more than 35 children" is wrong.  As of the Sept. 18 enrollment data, only two classes exist with over 30 students at AY; both are 4th grade classes and their enrollments are 33 and 31.

The class size reduction focus in Emery (and across the state and nation) is primarily on Kindergarten to grade 3.  Emery Unified kept Kindergarten to grade 3 class sizes at or near 20 students during the massive state budget cuts occasioned by the Great Recession—even after the State ended its Class Size Reduction funding.  We still keep K-3 class sizes at those levels.  Most other districts do not.  I regularly hear stories of K-3 classes with 27 to 30 students.  The parcel tax is why we've been able to maintain K-3 class sizes around 20 to 1. 

The 4th grade class sizes are higher than I would like, but we have to recognize that the 4th grade bump is the inevitable by-product of maintaining 20 to 1 class sizes K-3.  4th grade transitions to 2 teachers for the loop, instead of 3, for 60-odd students.  Having 3 teachers would be great, but that would mean adding a third teacher to both the 4th and 5th grade loops and reducing class sizes in those grades to 20 to 1 as well--something districts in California, including ours, cannot afford.  It's also worth noting that those 4th grade classes are split in half when they attend art and science.  Many districts don't have separate art and science teachers in the elementary grades.  Only because of our strong parcel tax have we been able to support a separate art and science teacher at Anna Yates.

The music program at the high school is quite strong, led by an excellent teacher in Mr. Salvatore.  I agree that it's unfortunate that Mr. Carroway's passing and tight budget times have led to discontinuing a regular music program at Anna Yates.  Fortunately, Superintendent Rubio plans to reinstitute music at AY if the parcel tax passes.  I understand he informed you of that commitment last week.  That's a pretty significant commitment from the district's superintendent to fail to quote or specifically mention.

You are also wrong to say the district has never quantified how the parcel tax supports our teachers.  The district has been able to hire and retain a stable of excellent teachers and, also of professionals who enable our teachers to do their job better and to want to stay here.  Together, these staff are one of the reasons I am most proud of Emery Unified. The parcel tax directly supports the salary of many of these teachers and instructional support personnel.  This has been quantified in reports to the Measure A oversight committee and, most recently, was reflected in an attachment published at the June 25th Board meeting (to the item regarding the Local Control Accountability Plan).

That document reflects that the parcel tax pays the salary of 3 English teachers at ESS; 1.2 elementary teachers at AY; the science teacher at AY and one of the science teachers at ESS; 2.2 math teachers at ESS; the music teacher at ESS; the librarian at AY, and the Wellness Coordinator and the school nurse among other personnel. Last time we looked, our district’s teacher salary was highly competitive in our labor market and our benefits package was one of the most, if not the most, generous in the area.  By supporting so many of our personnel directly, the parcel tax has obviously enabled us to retain these staff. Given that the parcel tax is 25-30% of the district’s budget, it is also true that it has been a key factor in our ability to maintain a competitive salary and benefits package to attract and retain our quality teachers.

You also inexplicably assert that the district has “failed to meet” requirements concerning the Oversight Committee for Measure A.  You don’t explain the basis for this.  The district has appointed a Citizen’s Oversight Committee for Measure A.  It meets regularly; reviews parcel tax expenditure reports; approves or, if it sees fit, challenges district proposed expenditures, and issues an annual report.  To my knowledge, the district and the committee have fulfilled the legal requirements for oversight committees. I know of no reason to believe otherwise.  As evidenced by the fact that it constitutes ¼ to nearly a third of our budget, the parcel tax provides a great many critical personnel and programs to our district. I want to see those people and programs continue.  I will be supporting Measure K. I hope all other Emeryville citizens who care about our children will too.

1. John Affeldt
2. Vice-President Emery Unified School Board (for identification only) 

John Affeldt has a son at Emery's Anna Yates Elementary School and was appointed to the School Board in July 2012.  For over twenty years he has worked on educational equity issues at Public Advocates in San Francisco where he has twice been recognized as an Attorney of the Year in California for his education work.  Mr Affeldt will face Emeryville voters in November as he seeks election to the School Board.

The Tattler Responds:

To Mr Affeldt-
Thank you for commenting. To get straight to it:
There is at least one class as of the first day of school with 36 children at Anna Yates Elementary School (AYES) and at least one with 35 children. The source of this information is the Superintendent of the Schools, John Rubio and two teachers who shall go nameless. If there was some drop-off by attrition over time, that would be considered a good thing in this case but still 33 children cannot reasonably be construed as a small class. Your explanation about other districts and grades 4-12 at Emery matters not. The point of the story is Emery is giving the voters the impression that class sizes will be small here if we vote for this measure. If it only pertains to K-3 well, the District should make that clear to the voters. If we're funding this by taxing ourselves more, there should be no equivocating or deception involved on the part of the District. You should tell us exactly what we're getting.

You are correct in conceding that the District killed the music program at AYES. That is a violation of the provisions of the previous parcel tax Measure A it should be known. Now we're being asked to fund a music program with measure K without any admission about this double dealing by the District. It's true Mr Rubio made a personal commitment to actually follow through this time with a music program if Measure K is passed and that's going to appear in a forthcoming Tattler story. Still, the charge remains; we paid for a music program at AYES and we didn't get it.

Regarding teacher retention as Measure K requires; again, we asked the Superintendent directly, how is the Measure K money going to be spent to retain teachers? His response, "I don't know". This is from the top and again, this will be highlighted in a future Tattler story. We hope your claim that Measure A money has been spent on teacher retention is true and we will include this in the future story.

Lastly, regarding that the District has failed to meet Oversight Committee meeting requirements; we stand by our claim. The Committee is supposed to meet twice a year, Spring and Fall to oversee Measure A spending and that has not occurred. You claim this is false but we have hereby given you a reason to believe otherwise... now please check our claim with the secretary of the Superintendent. The point of mentioning that the Oversight Committee has not met regularly as it is required to do is not to point out technical violation to play "got cha". The reason it's important to know this is that a committee that is properly functioning would know that the music program had been killed and moved to remedy that improper situation.

Remember, you as a School Board, have no choice: when you ask the public to voluntarily fund something by a parcel tax, you have to spend the money the way we agreed to. Otherwise, it's a breach of the public trust.

Emery School District Botches 'Measure K' Parcel Tax Rollout

School District Plays it Fast and Loose 
With Measure K 

Provisions Not Supported

Emeryville voters recently received in the mail a large glossy card from the Emery Unified School District with falsehoods and erroneous information about Measure K, the school parcel tax initiative on the ballot for the November 4th election.  Some of the information about the provisions describing how the parcel tax will help Emeryville schools are lifted verbatim from voter information flyers mailed before the passage of 2007's Measure A, a previous parcel tax that Measure K is meant to extend for 20 years.   Some of the Measure A provisions (which are operational until Measure K passes) failed to materialize and some of the Measure K claims to again fund these bogus provisions are dubious if not outright false.  The District is forging ahead with Measure K, undaunted by the clear misstatements in the new flyer.

The flyer, signed by Schools Superintendent John Rubio claims Measure K will provide supplemental taxpayer funding to support the following:

• "Strengthen and improve educational programs in music", the same language as Measure A even though the School District cancelled the music program at the elementary school years ago; a violation of the law.  The District is silent on the music program they killed but they are claiming if we vote to fund it a second time, presumably they'll finally take the will of the voters seriously.
• "Keep class sizes small", also the same language as Measure A even though some classes at the elementary school this year have more than 35 children, a number that no educator would call small.
• "Retain quality teachers", again the same language as Measure A even though the District has never quantified how they have spent money to retain teachers up till now and they still demur on this claim.

Further, the District again is claiming a State of California mandated citizen's Oversight Committee will be empaneled, meeting on a regular basis to advise the School Board about the proper expenditures of the proceeds, a mandate the School District failed to meet with regards to Measure A funds.

Like Measure A, Measure K has 'senior exemptions' meant to not unduly burden those on fixed incomes but on this count too, Measure A was found to be lacking in Emeryville.  In a low-water moment for the District, local resident Shirley Enomoto described in a Letter to the Tattler in April how she spent five years getting a reluctant Emery School District to honor the State required senior exemption as they promised.  No one from the District would comment on this but Ms Enomoto indicates [thanks to her efforts] they are now probably in compliance with the exemption at least.

The Tattler City Council Candidates Questionnaire

Candidates Questionnaire Preview 

As the November 4th City Council election heats up, we've noticed several timely and consequential topics are not being taken up by those who would challenge the candidates on behalf of the residents of Emeryville.  The Tattler seeks to rectify that with five questions addressing these topics in the resident's interest and likely to be actionable by the City Council in the near future for each of the four candidates.  We're happy to report all four candidates agreed to take part in this Tattler questionnaire.  The candidates have been given one week to respond.  Check back later for their responses.

 Here's what we asked of each candidate:

1)  Will you vote for, support and/or endorse Emeryville Measures U&V? Yes or no please.  If yes why and if no why not?  
These Measures will be on the same ballot for voters consideration.  Measure U asks if Emeryville should change its governing status from our current status; a so-called  'general law city' to a 'charter city'.  That would mean the residents have control of major governing decisions by plebiscite vs Sacramento controlling the governance here as is the case now under general law.  All our municipal neighbors; Berkeley, Oakland, Alameda and Piedmont among them are charter cities and Measure U is endorsed by the entire Emeryville City Council.  Measure V would allow for a real estate transfer fee to be levied when commercial or residential real estate is sold in town. The rate proposed by Measure V is less than our neighbors charge and passage would allow "funding to maintain essential city services such as: police, fire and emergency services protection; street, sewer and storm drain maintenance; park and open space development and maintenance; bike and pedestrian safety; child care and programs for youth and seniors" according to the City of Emeryville.  The entire City Council endorses Measure V.  Measure V requires Measure U's passage by the voters to be operational. 

2)    Do you support Emeryville’s Pedestrian/Bicycle Plan as it pertains to the Horton Street Bike Boulevard?  Would you weaken the Plan or would you defend it as it is?  
The Emeryville Bike Plan was formulated over a two year period by members of the community, the Bike Committee and city planning experts at Berkeley's Alta Planning.  The Plan cost Emeryville $200,000 and was commissioned and certified by a unanimous vote of the City Council.  It represents a balanced approach to transportation needs for all stakeholders; drivers, bikers and pedestrians.  Hollis Street is given over to cars according to the Plan but Horton Street has been earmarked as a bike transportation corridor, connecting to bike boulevards in Berkeley to the north and Oakland to the south making for seamless regional north/south bike commuting.  Almost 30% of Horton Street traffic is now bike traffic and the number is growing.  The Plan calls for no more than 3000 vehicle trips per day on the Boulevard (Berkeley's bike boulevards are only allowed no more than 1500 trips).  The Plan calls for traffic calming for bike boulevards in town that exceed the 3000 safety threshold metric.  The highest level of traffic calming according to the Plan is 'level 5' that involves traffic diverters to guarantee vehicle traffic remains less than 3000 per day.   Horton Street now has more than 3000 vehicle trips and this means traffic calming must be implemented with either diverters or other less draconian means as called for in the Plan.  Some in town have called for dismantling the Horton Street Bike Boulevard altogether.

3)  In the future, how should the City guarantee independently owned and locally serving (non-formula) retail associated with residential and commercial development projects, if at all?
 Emeryville has been requiring a street level retail component at most residential development projects but many developers aren't interested in managing retail tenants and as a consequence, many storefront shop spaces remain perpetually boarded up.  Other developers simply let the market decide who rents their spaces and these have generally been 'formula' retail chain stores and fast food franchises owing to the high rent charged to pay for the new construction.  Many residents have called for locally serving, locally owned retail in Emeryville and some have even called for worker owned businesses; a change in the dynamics that have heretofore been at play in Emeryville.

4)  How do you define family friendly housing for Emeryville?  How do we get it?  How much is needed?
Virtually everyone in town has said Emeryville has rushed towards flawed residential development policy, a model that has precluded housing for families with children.  Many have noted our commitment to spend more than $100 million on the Center of 'Community' Life, a new K-12 school campus, as the primary reason for the now critical need for family friendly housing.  Some people in town, including some current City Council members have defined 'family friendly housing' simply as units with three or more bedrooms.  Others have said families need more than that.

5)  Should the City encourage residents to enter into Community Benefits Agreements (CBA's) with large development projects? How?  
Community Benefits Agreements are legally binding agreements between citizens and private developers meant to deliver amenities to residents above and beyond any agreements made between the city and the developer.  These agreements are a form of direct democratic action engaging an active citizenry.   Municipalities sometimes act as interested third parties encouraging and facilitating such democratic negotiation without dictating terms or driving the negotiations.  CBA's are common in Oakland, Berkeley and other Bay Area cities but there is yet no history of them in Emeryville.

League of Women Voters Hosts Emeryville Candidates Forum

From our friends at the League of Woman Voters:

Alameda County Fire Department Rescues Emery Schools With Donations

The Alameda County Fire Department Union, Local 55 responded to Emery school teacher's pleas for requisitions for the start of the new school year with a massive school supply drive culminating with a big school site presentation on Tuesday.
Individual fire fighters stood in front of Office Max, Toys R Us and other such stores for weeks collecting donations for the drive.
The huge haul presented to the Emery schools by the Fire Department this year stood in contrast to the supplies donated from the Emery Education Fund, the organization tasked with the yearly school supply drives.  Teachers noted in recent years the hauls from the Ed Fund have been lacking prompting the Fire Fighters Union Local 55 to step in this year.
An anonymous teacher opined the Ed Fund donation drive had come up short again this year, "It's pretty pathetic"the teacher said of the meager offerings, "It's less than $100 worth."
Any thoughts of disappointment in the performance by the Emery Ed Fund however were quickly forgotten after the big red antique fire truck arrived bearing the proceeds from Local 55.

Thanks to the Alameda County Fire Department Union Local 55 and Anna Yates Elementary School teacher Tiffany Johnson for coordinating the supply drive.

• Home
• Mail
• News
• Sports
• Finance
• Weather
• Games
• Groups
• Answers
• Screen
• Flickr
• Mobile
• More

City Calls For Community/Business Input on Horton Street Bike Boulevard

The City Council is soliciting opinions from the community and businesses on whether or how to implement the Pedestrian/Bicycle Plan with regards to the Horton Street Bike Boulevard:

Letter to the Tattler: Christian Patz

Received from Emery School Board member Christian Patz:

Your opinion piece on August 30^th [New High Buy-In Make Emery School Board Elections Exclusive], brought attention to the fees charged by the Alameda County Registrar of Voters to candidates for the Emery School Board of Trustees.  I am newly appointed to the Board and I'm a candidate for the position in the November general election.  Your story accurately stated, candidates for Emery School Board must pay $832 if they want to have their candidate statement published in the voter guide.   

As someone who was impacted by this fee, I agree with the concept that we need to keep money out of politics. I am not sure this plan solves the problem. While your plan would help the first three people, it does not offer relief to everybody. The biggest challenge I had in filing my paperwork was getting to the office during business hours. Once there, I had to decide if I could afford the outlay of the fee. On that day, I felt I could not. This may hurt my election chances, but it was the right decision at the time. An alternative that I could support is what they do in other races; pay the fee or present registered voter's signatures. I think the community should decide if the District should pay for the publication of a candidate’s statement. 

Christian Patz, Ed.D.

Appointed Incumbent and Candidate for Emery School Board

           
Christian R. Patz (Ed.D.) is on the Emery Unified School District Board of Trustees, appointed to the position last June to fill in for outgoing Board member Josh Simon. Mr Patz is currently a Special Education Administrator at the Mt Diablo Unified School District and he is running for election to the Emery School Board in November.  His campaign website is HERE.
Christian lives in Emeryville with his wife and young child.

Follow the Money: Emeryville's November Election Draws Sacramento Lobbying Group

Out-Of-Town Real Estate Interests Set Up Political Committee for Emeryville Election

Statewide Realtor Association Money Dump 
Special Moneyed Interests Work to Nix Local Control

Follow the Money; first in a series

The Tattler introduces a new feature for the 2014 election season: Follow the Money. 

This election cycle is shaping up to be very expensive and very far-flung with lots of money from out-of-town interests pouring into the city.  We plan on digging out and exposing this money from people and organizations we don’t know that are trying to change our town to their liking.  These unfamiliar individuals and interest groups may effect our November elections with all their spending in Emeryville but the Tattler is going to make sure that while they assert their influence, we’re going to expose who they are. 

Click on the 'Follow the Money' label at the bottom of this story or use the search bar to review the entire Follow the Money series.

Emeryville residents, get ready to get "IMPACed".
That being a big money dump from the California Association of Realtors political action committee to fight against a November election over local control of the town.
IMPAC, Issues Mobilization Political Action Committee, is the political action arm of the Sacramento based statewide Realtors Association, the State's top real estate lobbying group.
The issue at hand are two Emeryville ballot initiatives, both brought by unanimous consent of our City Council for a vote by the citizens November 4th; one being Measure U the Charter City Initiative, a local control initiative and the other Measure V, an initiative to establish a real estate transfer fee, the same fee charged by neighboring cities Alameda, Oakland and Berkeley.

The committee set up to fight both initiatives is calling itself "Citizens to Preserve Emeryville" and lists its Treasurer and Vice Treasurer as hailing from Sacramento and Oakland respectively.  The bank for  Citizens to Preserve Emeryville is in Roseville California.

Emeryville Chamber
of Commerce Vice Chair
Jason Crouch
His backing of the Realtors
subverted the will
of the Chamber. 

A check of the filing documents shows IMPAC has kicked off the spending on the Emeryville ballot initiatives with an initial drop of $20,000.  An extra $5,000 in "interboard solicitations" was also approved to fight Emeryville, IMPAC records showed.  With nearly unlimited resources available at the 160,000 member California Association of Realtors, more money could follow as the anti-Emeryville local control campaign progresses.

Chamber of Commerce's Interests Hijacked
The drama of the California Association of Realtors pushing their weight around Emeryville is further heightened by the unseemly spectacle of the Vice Chair of the Emeryville Chamber of Commerce, Vallejo resident Jason Crouch, hijacking the Chamber's wishes by joining the fight against U&V.  The Board of the Chamber of Commerce has voted to join with the City of Emeryville and endorse both Measures but Mr Crouch signed his name and he included his Vice Chair position on the Chamber Board to the ballot measure arguments against U&V.  
The ballot measure arguments for and against will be in the official Voters Guide printed by Alameda County appearing in voter's mailboxes later this month.

The Sacramento real estate group's chief argument against the charter city initiative (a municipal governance model referred to as 'local rule' or 'home rule') is that it will allow Emeryville citizens themselves to decide many functions of governance that Sacramento now dictates with Emeryville as a 'general law' city.  The actual vote in November will only give Emeryville residents local rule to the extent that they decide whether to initiate a real estate transfer fee.  As it stands now Emeryville misses out on the funds from these transfers that our neighboring cities collect.

The City Council has noted with the demise of the Emeryville Redevelopment Agency, an entity that formerly entailed 90% of the town, fully half of the city budget has been lost.  Infrastructure, parks, maintenance--the things City Hall builds for residents to retain the quality of life will be increasingly out of reach.  Further it should be noted that Sacramento gets to change the rules on general law cities moving forward.  That's what happened when the Redevelopment Agency was eliminated.  Without the local control that the charter city designation brings, Emeryville won't have a right to collect the same fees as the neighbors, putting our budget at risk.

Some are speculating the California Association of Realtors sees Emeryville's local control vote in November as potentially a landmark case, spurring other general law cities in California to became charter cities.