Search The Tattler

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

How Much Have Low Wages Cost Emeryville Taxpayers?

As the City of Emeryville moves on July 1st to raise up the minimum wage on a path to $15 per hour in 2018, residents are reminded of the hidden costs of low wages.  The Tattler has reported how poverty wages (or sub-poverty wages as we have called them) represent a wealth transference from middle class taxpayers to business owners; in effect a business subsidy.   After a generation of development featuring lots of low wage service sector jobs in Emeryville brought by City Hall, it would be wise to consider the unintended consequences of this kind of development. 
From the University of California Berkeley Labor Center:

Poverty-level wages cost U.S. taxpayers $153 billion every year

While the U.S. economy rebounds, persistent low wages are costing taxpayers approximately $153 billion every year in public support to working families, including $25 billion at the state level, according to a new report from the University of California, Berkeley, Center for Labor Research and Education.  The report details for the first time the state-by-state cost to taxpayers of low wages in the United States.

fast-food court
More than half of low-wage fast-food workers nationwide take advantage of public assistance, ranging from food stamps to Medicaid. (Photo licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 by Drpoulette)

Following decades of wage cuts and health benefits rollbacks, more than half of all state and federal spending on public assistance programs (56 percent) now goes to working families, the report documents.
“When companies pay too little for workers to provide for their families, workers rely on public assistance programs to meet their basic needs,” said Ken Jacobs, chair of the labor center and co-author of the new report.  “This creates significant cost to the states.”
The report analyzed state spending for Medicaid/Children’s Health Insurance Program and Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF), and federal spending for those programs and food stamps (SNAP) and the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC).
The UC Berkeley researchers also report that:
  • On average, 52 percent of state public assistance spending supports working families, with costs as high as $3.7 billion in California, $3.3 billion in New York and $2 billion in Texas.
  • Reliance on public assistance can be found among workers in a diverse range of occupations, including frontline fast-food workers (52%), childcare workers (46%), home care workers (48%) and even part-time college faculty (25%).
From 2003 to 2013, wage growth remained flat or negative for the entire bottom 70 percent of workers in the United States, Jacobs said.  Over the same time, the share of non-elderly Americans receiving health insurance from an employer fell almost 10 percentage points, from 67 percent to 58 percent. Despite modest pay raises at some of the country’s largest and most profitable employers, including Walmart and McDonald’s, wages continue to lag far behind inflation.
The researchers note that raising wages would result in significant savings to state and federal governments.  In recent months, the substantial cost of low wages has prompted elected officials to take action. California, Colorado, Maine, Oregon and Washington are considering increasing the minimum wage to $12 or higher. In Connecticut, a proposal currently moving through the state legislature would fine large companies that pay low wages in an effort to recoup the cost these companies impose on taxpayers.  The Congressional Democrats’ fiscal year 2016 budget proposal unveiled last month included a provision that would roll back tax breaks for large companies that fail to raise pay on pace with inflation.
“Our public-assistance programs provide a vital support system for American families.  Raising wages would lift working families out of poverty and allow all levels of government to better target how our tax dollars are used,” Jacobs said.
Funding was provided by the Service Employees International Union.


  1. This is interesting research. By raising someone’s wage from $12 per hour to $15, they believe they will not need public services anymore. Monthly, this wage increase will add up to be a $500 per month gross increase in wages. After taxes their additional income will be about $350. Will that amount take care of their healthcare, childcare, education, and food?, all that they were previously receiving from government. I don’t believe any of these workers who are on assistance will ever give up what they got for a few bucks a day. Is this some kind of Republican scheme to force people off welfare or is it a Liberal taxation scheme to put more money in the coffers off the backs of low wage workers?

    1. The amount needed to be ineligible for government assistance (welfare, food stamps, etc) in the Bay Area is currently $14.42 but will increase over time. This has been calculated by the City of Emeryville for use in setting wage rates for private vendors to City Hall and for City Hall employees themselves (a small group of workers to be sure). The idea that a living wage should at a minimum, make a worker ineligible for government assistance, is the central philosophic core of the existing 'living wage' law City Hall has for this small group of workers.
      Whether or not this is 'republican' or 'liberal' is up to you I suppose.